From: Matt K. <kr...@al...> - 2000-09-30 00:12:45
|
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 05:40:30PM +0300, Jaakko Heinonen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 04:25:52PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > If you'd like I can change it to do the following: > > > > Assume there is also a qwertz@3 address. > > > > return_all_emails=0 -> qwerty@1 test > > qwerty@2 test > > > > return_all_emails=1 -> qwerty@1 test > > qwerty@2 test > > qwertz@3 test > > > > Would you prefer this? > > Yes, because if you have the e-mail addresses in different order you'll get > a different result. OK, the attached patch does it. By the way, is there a reason why a blank line is printed before the addresses? mutt seems to work fine with or without it. Matt |