zhouming

OK, I will try it. But based on my tests last week, I found that some source file failed to generate dump files in one night. So it seems abnarmal. ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "[cppcheck:discussion] " <danielmarjamaki@users.sourceforge.net>; Date: Sun, Feb 13, 2022 04:16 PM To: "[cppcheck:discussion] "<general@discussion.cppcheck.p.re.sourceforge.net>; Subject: [cppcheck:discussion] The performance of the cppcheck --dump function is significantly degraded If you wonder why...

OK, I will try it. But based on my tests last week, I found that some source file failed to generate dump files in one night(ver2.6). So it seems abnarmal.

My command is : cppcheck -f --language=c++ --dump source_file thanks~

My command is : cppcheck -f --language=c++ --dump source_file thanks~

I use cppcheck dump function to generate dump file and find that some of dump file has a huge file size, so I want to ask that if it could be optimized. I tested "nr_polar_kronecker_power_matrices.c" file from "https://gitlab.eurecom.fr/oai/openairinterface5g/-/tree/develop" project, and got a huge file size(1.12GB), please see the attachment png file.

I tested three versions of cppcheck for dump output of source files, 1.9, 2.2, and 2.6, and found that the efficiency of the dump function was significantly reduced. I suggest that the new version be optimized. cmd: cppcheck -f --language=c++ --dump src_dir I test same 22 src files in src_dir, and get the time consume: version 1.9: 0.9655min version 2.2: 1.2828min version 2.6: 2.7085min