Satpro

Another workaround: ignore the warning. It leaves the warning box on top, but everything will still function properly. Not a workaround: not using Win 7. It is the ONLY Windows you want to use.

This still happens on Win7 (build 40773).

I knew it was a real, re-producible bug a long time ago! More like... four years later, no one EVER bothered to look at it at all, and now it's time to clear out old un-solveds. S.O.P. We are long past this one and know better than to write to Bank $01 < $0100. Good thing no one was holding their breath.

I have no idea how to burn a custom ROM for a real SuperCPU, and with the low number of units out there, it seems pointless. This is for a custom $F8 ROM which is downloaded to static RAM in much the same way as the original. We're trying something new -- a Native mode OS for VICE. Our fix was to move the code to $0100. It works great there, and those involved are fine with that. I consider it solved insofar as we have a workaround.

I have no idea how to burn a custom ROM for a real SuperCPU, and with the low number of units out there, it seems pointless. This is for a custom $F8 ROM which is downloaded to static RAM in much the same way as the original. We're trying something new -- a Native mode OS for VICE. Our fix was to move the code to $0100. It works great there, and those involved are fine with that. I consider it solved as far as that we have a workaround.

Well, that's fine. We will trudge on nonetheless. If and when I find the actual answer, it will be posted here.

Probably not. It is part of an OS we are working on, and it involves a new $F8 ROM and an entirely new way of using the VICE SuperCPU. The problem showed up when the RAM code was moved to $01:0000 from $01:0100. We were just trying to take advantage of an extra page. I have traced the execution countless times, eliminated other "stuff" as much as possible, and have had no luck whatsover. I wish I knew the answer. This only shows up when the code executes in the $00xx page of memory, and only (so...

I meant "Program Bank", not Program Counter. Apologies.