David

Version 1.26.26 works great on my Win11 x64, 24H2. It takes only a fraction (perhaps not even a second) longer than using SHA-512. Version 1.26.25 took about 7 secs.

Version 1.26.26 works great on my Win11 x64, 24H2. It takes only a fraction (perhaps not even a second) longer than using SHA-512.

Sorry, not so much time, currently. But this was the answer I didn't want to receive. I hoped for a simple help and possible guidance, like yes, or no... That's why I have put this question on the forum...

No, no system encryption, just file containers or encrypted non-system partitions. I have not read it yet, but if you just can reply in one sentence that would be just fine :)

I often use hibernate functionality and want to continue using it. So is hardware RAM (when only hardware RAM is used) vulnerable after PC shut off?

One more thought. But not having a swap/paging file set on the system and relying entirely on hardware RAM probably still could have some advantage - it cannot be scanned once the PC is shut down. That is, if the swap/paging file can still be accessed and scanned even after shut down (by booting from external medium), unless it was erased. Could that be an advatage of a purely hardware RAM still?

One more idea. But not having a swap/paging file on the system and relying entirely on hardware RAM probably could still have some advantage - it cannot be scanned once the PC is shut down. That is, if the swap/paging file can still be accessed and scanned even after shut down (by booting from external medium), unless it was erased. Any thoughts on that?

One more idea. But not having a swap/paging file on the system and relying entirely on hardware RAM probably could still have some advantage - it cannot be scanned once the PC is shut down. That is, if the swap/paging file can still be accessed and scanned even after shut down, unless it was erased. Any thoughts on that?