Uzume

Perhaps the solution is to merge these different author views into a single CGI with different sort criteria to help with code maintenance issues like these (or optionally leverage the code into libraries)

Perhaps the solution is to merge these different author views into a single CGI with different sort criteria to help with code maintenance issues like these

I definitely think this option should have different naming than the original "Add Pub". I do not see why we could not allow all other pub types as well, however, as these would essentially just be create new pub with a prefilled title "export" to the new pub in a single edit/submission. I am already advocating for merging new pub/edit pub, etc. with title imports/exports.

I definately think this option should have different naming than the original "Add Pub". I do not see why we could no allow all other pub types as well, however, these would essentially just be create new pub with a prefilled title "export" to the new pub in a single edit/submission. I am already advocating for merging new pub/edit pub, etc. with title imports/exports.

I am not sure we have other "container" title types but this should apply to all such. I just noticed the EDITOR container title type did not allow such (and I know it used to eons ago and I finally got around to characterizing the issue which resulted in this FR).

I like the idea of converting/renaming the existing "Moderator Note" to "Edit Summary" or "Submission Note" (another alternative might be "Editor Note" since the editor creates and submits the note with the rest of the submission) as they can be read and be useful for more than just moderation puposes. I like the idea of renaming and generalizing the existing "Rejection Reason". I recommend renaming it something like "Status Note" or "Moderator Note" (since it is created by the moderator; yes, such...

I like the idea of converting/renaming the existing "Moderator Note" to "Submission Note" (another alternative might be "Editor Note" since the editor creates and submits the note with the rest of the submission) as they can be read and be useful for more than just moderation puposes. I like the idea of renaming and generalizing the existing "Rejection Reason". I recommend renaming it something like "Status Note" or "Moderator Note" (since it is created by the moderator; yes, such a change might...

I personally am of the persuasion that we want such a field and it need not be a numeric field and instead a general text string is probably the best (with some useful Help/advice about how it should be used also necessary). We could also add some sort of issue rank typing field to go with this allowing one to select "via statement", "via number line", "assumed; see pub note for evidence", etc. I recommend the issue rank type field be limited in value much like format and pub type are. I believe...