Benny King

PLEASE DELETE.. WRONG TITLE..

Hey guys Can someone please help me with this extremely annoying problem? msg:progress: Saving state to C:/Users//Documents/SnapRAID.content... msg:progress: Saving state to U:/SnapRAID.content... msg:verbose: 10353 files msg:verbose: 0 hardlinks msg:verbose: 0 symlinks msg:verbose: 5 empty dirs msg:progress: Verifying... msg:progress: Verified C:/Users//Documents/SnapRAID.content in 0 seconds msg:progress: Verified U:/SnapRAID.content in 1 seconds msg:progress: Using 224 MiB of memory for 64 cached...

Yes, and that works fine. I got it to finish last night but it did another CRC error on a different location. I cannot figure out what causes this.. I delete the temp files run a status and this time it went to 77% i increased the amount between save states so it didn't have to constantly write and verify the content files,and it finished.

Anyone know why a scrub always fail with a content CRC error at 64% done according to status? I delete the temp files,and try again from where it failed, but CRC happens on different drive then 10% into scrub, and status still says only 64% scrub is done.. All drives are tip top no errors which is why this is baffling to me. Any idea why the heck this has begun to happen all of a sudden?

Question. My sync runs at 1600MB/s but the fix runs at max 130MB/s is this normal?

I see now, you are one of those people!!!! My problem is fixed so i am outta here. Good luck everyone..

Easier to just amend the conf file with a # and add 1 drive at a time to SR scrub.. And yes i understood perfectly, but what you are doing is needlessly complicated opening that many windows.. And you get no log file with an error code, and easier to monitor a single application than 20 in resource monitor. At no point was i "insulting" i just didnt see the point of your "method", still don't for that matter.. And i am done "debating" with you about anything.. Good luck Runewa.

Easier to just amend the conf file with a # and add 1 drive at a time to SR scrub.. And yes i understood perfectly, but what you are doing is needlessly complicated opening that many windows.. And you get no log file with an error code, and easier to monitor a single application than 20 in resource monitor. At no point was i "insulting" i just didnt see the point of your "method", still don't for that matter..