Simon Slater

I think at this point the two projects are so different that we just need to pick one and move on, so I guess I'll join you with backporting features from v2.0 to 1.x. v2.0 has a better git history to work with, so I guess it makes sense. @guiv I've been trying to use git bisect to find the working version with note selection, so I can help. I struggled with compiling, because there's different versions of SWT and Java used. Because of this, I've wrote a little script and guide to help us with compiling...

Yes, the commits without any comments in 1.x git log all say they're akdmia's. See below for the version history and commits. I was looking through the git log manually for any changes to TGVersion.java, then I found this really useful git command to just show me all the git commits and the changes to that file. git log --follow -p -- TuxGuitar-lib/src/org/herac/tuxguitar/util/TGVersion.java Note: v1.x and 2.0 last shared commit was on Mar 24 2019. For the v1.x fork Dates the version changed: v1.5.6...

Yes, the commits without any comments in 1.x git log all say they're akdmia's. See below for the version history and commits. I was looking through the git log manually for any changes to TGVersion.java, then I found this really useful git command to just show me all the git commits and the changes to that file. git log --follow -p -- TuxGuitar-lib/src/org/herac/tuxguitar/util/TGVersion.java Note: v1.x and 2.0 last shared commit was on Mar 24 2019. For the v1.x fork Dates the version changed: v1.5.6...

I think I'm a bit torn between the versions. Personally, I'd vote for v2.0, because I can see the improvements, both in the GUI and from the git commits. 1.x has some missing git comments :(. That being said, the midi playback didn't work on 2.0 for me(ubuntu), but does in 1.x. I compiled both from the helge17 forks. I'm not too sure how hard it would be to backport the changes from 2.0, because there has been a lot of work on it(see below). I do however like the idea of TuxGuitar working on android,...

I think I'm a bit torn between the versions. Personally, I'd vote for v2.0, because I can see the improvements, both in the GUI and from the git commits. 1.x has some missing git comments :(. That being said, the midi playback didn't work on 2.0 for me(ubuntu), but does in 1.x. I compiled both from the helge17 forks. I'm not too sure how hard it would be to backport the changes from 2.0, because there has been a lot of work on it(see below). I do however like the idea of TuxGuitar working on android,...

Hello, I'd like to help out with this a little as well :). I love TuxGuitar, but it's become a bit of a nuisance to keep up with where to grab the 'most recent version' from, because of the split in development. The way I use TuxGuitar is to learn a song and to play along with it at increasing speeds. Every time I use it, it feels clunky to practice a small section of a song, and I think "I should just write the code for this". I'd like to work on being able to select a section, set a loop, and easily...

Hello, I'd like to help out with this a little as well :). I love TuxGuitar, but it's become a bit of a nuisance to keep up with where to grab the 'most recent version' from, because of the split in development. The way I use TuxGuitar is to learn a song and to play along with it at increasing speeds. Every time I use it, it feels clunky to practice a small section of a song, and I think "I should just write the code for this". I'd like to work on being able to select a section, set a loop, and easily...