User Activity
-
Posted
a comment
on
ticket #4073
on
Small Device C Compiler (SDCC)
The patch looks good to me. For now, IMO we should wait a few days for the discussion on sdcc-devel on LLM use to settle.
-
Posted
a comment
on
ticket #4004
on
Small Device C Compiler (SDCC)
The patch looks good to me (except for the naming of the parameters - I'd prefer "target" instead of "new", "source" instead of "orig" to keep the terminology consistent, but I can change that when applying). For now, IMO we should wait a few days for the discussion on sdcc-devel on LLM use to settle.
-
Posted
a comment
on
ticket #4003
on
Small Device C Compiler (SDCC)
The approach would work, but it doesn't feel elegant to me. Treating pointer arithmetic on _Optional differently for so long feels (i.e. from AST to the early stages of processing the iCode) inelegant. Maybe we should keep all these +0 in AST, and eliminate them later? But that might have a code quality penalty (but if that is the case, we'd already see a code quality regression for adding zero to pointers to _Optional with this patch).
-
Posted
a comment
on
ticket #518
on
Small Device C Compiler (SDCC)
The test passes for me, even with current SDCC.
-
Posted
a comment
on
ticket #4000
on
Small Device C Compiler (SDCC)
The patch looks good to me. When I apply it, I'll also add a test in support/valdiag. For now, IMO we should wait a few days for the discussion on sdcc-devel on LLM use to settle.
-
Posted
a comment
on
ticket #517
on
Small Device C Compiler (SDCC)
The changes to SDCC itself look good to me. But I'm not a Python programmer, so I'd like to get the opinion of someone who knows Python (used for the test) before the patch goes in.
-
Modified
a comment
on
ticket #624
on
Small Device C Compiler (SDCC)
The copy of *object to *expected is not required to be atomic, only the read of *object is atomic, the write to *expected does not need to be. Only *object is an atomic type, *expected isn't. So I think our current implementation should be good enough.
-
Modified
a comment
on
ticket #624
on
Small Device C Compiler (SDCC)
The copy of *object to *expected is not required to be atomic, only the read of *object is atomic, the write to *expected does not need to be. Only *object is an atomic type, *expected isn't.
Personal Data
- Username:
- spth
- Joined:
- 2002-06-16 16:36:10
Projects
This is a list of open source software projects that Philipp Klaus Krause is associated with:
- Schlange 2 Last Updated:
-
Small Device C Compiler (SDCC) The Small Device C Compiler (SDCC), targeting 8-bit architectures Last Updated:
- eclipseSDCC Last Updated:
- lnlc lnlc calculates linear nlc-width and corresponding expressions Last Updated:
- rw rw calculates rank-width and rank-decompositions. Last Updated:
- slgraph a graph format and library for sublinear graph algorithms Last Updated:
- stdcbench Last Updated:
- stm8 binutils-gdb stm8 binutils gdb Last Updated:
- zshg constant-time graph connectivity test Last Updated:
Skills
This is a list of skills that Philipp Klaus Krause possesses:
- C
- C++
- Assembly
- Scheme
