Jay K

Thank you very much. So when trying to fix, how do you propose I go about it? I have some files I know were on the 2nd subvolume still. So I'm thinking, I will rebuild the subvolume structure and mount both of the pseudodisks, though they will be empty. I will then use the following command: snapraid -d d3 -d d4 -l fix.log -i directoryWithSomeMissingFilesFromd4 fix Is this correct?

Thank you very much. So when trying to fix, how do you propose I go about it? I have some files I know were on the 2nd subvolume still. So I'm thinking, I will rebuild the subvolume structure and mount both of the pseudodisks, though they will be empty. I will then use the following command: snapraid -d d3 -d d4 -l fix.log -i directoryWithSomeMissingFilesFromd4 fix Is this correct? Also one other thing, I have some of the same files from d4 but I don't think the timestamps will match with what is...

Thank you very much. So when trying to fix, how do you propose I go about it? I have some files I know were on the 2nd subvolume still. So I'm thinking, I will rebuild the subvolume structure and mount both of the pseudodisks, though they will be empty. I will then use the following command: snapraid -d d3 -d d4 -l fix.log -i directoryWithSomeMissingFilesFromd4 fix Is this correct? Also one other thing, I have the same files but I don't think the timestamps will match with what is in parity (the...

"disk" = btrfs subvolume disk = physical disk So I very stupidly was using btrfs subvolumes to have two snapraid data "disks" on the same physical disk, with 2 additional physical disks as snapraid data disks and 1 physical disk as parity. When I lost the underlying physical disk, I lost both data "disks". The 2nd "disk" barely had any data ( a handful of files, a few GB at most), but the the 1st "disk" had a lot (at least 8TB). Is it even worth attempting recovery in this scenario (I am not expecting...

"disk" = btrfs subvolume disk = physical disk So I very stupidly was using btrfs subvolumes to have two snapraid data "disks" on the same physical disk, with 2 additional physical disks as snapraid data disks and 1 physical disk as parity. When I lost the underlying physical disk, I lost both data "disks". The 2nd "disk" barely had any data ( a handful of files, a few GB at most), but the the 1st "disk" had a lot (at least 8TB). Is it even worth attempting recovery in this scenario (I am not expecting...

"disk" = btrfs subvolume disk = physical disk So I very stupidly was using btrfs subvolumes to have two snapraid data "disks" on the same physical disk, with 2 additional physical disks as snapraid data disks and 1 physical disk as parity. When I lost the underlying physical disk, I lost both data "disks". The 2nd "disk" barely had any data ( a handful of files, a few GB at most), but the the 1st "disk" had a lot (at least 8TB). Is it even worth attempting recovery in this scenario (I am not expecting...

"disk" = btrfs subvolume disk = physical disk So I very stupidly was using btrfs subvolumes to have two snapraid data "disks" on the same physical disk, with 2 additional physical disks as snapraid data disks and 1 physical disk as parity. When I lost the underlying physical disk, I lost both data "disks". The 2nd "disk" barely had any data ( a handful of files, a few GB at most), but the the 1st "disk" had a lot (at least 8TB). Is it even worth attempting recovery in this scenario (I am not expecting...

"disk" = btrfs subvolume disk = physical disk So I very stupidly was using btrfs subvolumes to have two snapraid data "disks" on the same physical disk, with 2 additional physical disks as snapraid data disks. When I lost the underlying physical disk, I lost both data "disks" despite having only 1 parity disk. The 2nd "disk" barely had any data ( a handful of files, a few GB at most), but the the 1st "disk" had a lot (at least 8TB). Is it even worth attempting recovery in this scenario (I am not...