James

Thanks Werner. It was more to do with what packages are avaliable. In a previous release I followed the upgrade instructions for installing the roll but when doing testing with yum update had the incompatibility with CentOs 7.5 library (has now been fixed). This meant I then had to completely remove the roll and re-add the old version and make sure I used the correct version. Thanks again, James

Hi Werner, First thanks again for the update to support Centos 7.5. I was going to ask if it may be possible to use the Rocks Version attribute for Slurm Roll releases? At present every slurm release is version 7.0.0. This means there is no easy way to roll back an update. I have to disable and remove the roll and then add and enable the replacement iso. However with version numbers I could disable the old release add the new release and enable new one. If something goes wrong I can just disable...

Hi Werner, First thanks again for the update to support Centos 7.5. I was going to ask if it may be possible to use the Rocks Version attribute for Slurm Roll releases? At present every slurm release is version 7.0.0. This means there is no easy way to roll back an update. I have to disable and remove the roll and then add and enable the replacement iso. However with version numbers I could disable the old release add the new release and enable new one. If something goes wrong I can just disable...

Read the whole manual, in particular section on slurm_pam_enable

Thanks for the Slurm Roll Werner. One small problem that was mentioned on mailing,list was a missing link to libtool-ltdl in the xml graph. https://lists.sdsc.edu/pipermail/npaci-rocks-discussion/2018-January/071246.html Has there been any other updates now that Rocks 7 is out of beta? Thanks.

Thanks for your help Werner. I reverted PDSH back to Rocks version to fix the problem,...

EPEL package installs to /usr/bin/pdsh ROCKS package installs to /opt/pdsh/bin/pdsh...

And I have just discovered that I appear to have a PDSH package from EPEL instead...