nokia808

Hi. Thank you very much for your hard efforts ! But, dear, why your flatpak is only available on your sourceforge page only & not submitted to FlatHub !! Post your flatpak on FlatHub will make almost all Linux user see it & know about it, while keep it only on your project page will not help to bring the attantion of peples to it ..... I'm, myself, know about your program by chance when I was searching for other project within sourceforge, when sourceforge gave me a side link to your project ! Kindly,...

Please do not tired your self with snap ! Do not think about it at all ! It is anti-Linux in aim ! It is the worest think of universal Linux packages (Flatpak, AppImage, Snap) ! Snap is designed AND CONTROLLED by Canonical which is a company it's aim is the GAIN not the benefit of community. GNU/Linux is aiming to serve community & if there is a gain (if any) should never be beyond the princilpe of community bebefet .... Cononical do the reverse ..... Moreover, snapcraft has hidden telemetry that...

@enlf I'm very sorry for that, you close this issue ! 1) AppImage format will cost you more efforts than flatpak, because you need to give indevidual built-in support for every distro you like your AppImage to run on - within same AppImage universal package that you will create. There is no such additional efforts with flatpak - see: https://github.com/junrrein/pdfslicer/issues/103 2) AppImage need to be manually installed. Manuall instalation is not a convenent method for Linux & AppImage is only...

[Packaging] Make this program available as flatpak on FlatHub

[Packaging] Make this program available as flatpak package on FlatHub

[Packaging] Make this program available as flatpak package on FlatHub

"Attach my public key to message" option does not saved !

"Update components" option do not working on Fedora Linux