Ken Arnold

(a) Wow, a real bug report after all this time! (b) Seems an easy fix, though I'm not 100% convinced of the underlying bug's explanation. They could at least have required a non-null response, since I suspect lots of code never expected that. (c) I'd tend to leave the check in, but make it robust. Who knows, someone may run this on 1.5 again‽ I'll have to fire this up again. (d) I'm glad it works still! But I'm guessing there are new GUI things that need treatment, not that I've been following it....

Well, huh. That’s interesting. I haven’t touched this code in a long time, you’d be welcome to take a stab at it, it might take me a while to get to it. I’m curious what you’re using it for (as always, sometimes I think I should have made this postcardware :-) On Jan 18, 2018, at 12:31 AM, ludarp ludarp@users.sf.net wrote: [feature-requests:#14] https://sourceforge.net/p/napkinlaf/feature-requests/14/ Disabled effect draws back-buffer garbage Status: open Group: Next Release (example) Created: Thu...

Sigh, clearly using java.net for the wiki was a bad idea, the wiki is gone and I...

We haven't been doing so for a while, are you interested in taking a whack at it?...