User Activity

  • Posted a comment on discussion Help on SnapRAID

    Thanks for your kind reply Andrea That's kind of weird, but would explain why the bad blocks disappeared and why no matter what I did, there was no trace of them anymore. Next time this should happen, I think the best I can do is save a copy of the 'damaged' files, fix them, and do a file compare to check if corruption really did happen and in which proportions Many thanks, and thanks for all the commits you're doing towards 15.0 release!

  • Modified a comment on discussion Help on SnapRAID

    update: after reading carefully the docs, I'm even more convinced that I am missing something: once a block is marked as bad, (if I understand correctly) a sync should ignore the bad blocks in regards to updating the parity. To sum up the events in a comprehensible manner: 1- ran snapraid sync from cli (no logs, alas), 11 data errors found. I have just the list of bad blocks and the path of just one of the corrupted files from what's left in the console 2- ran snapraid sync (scheduled helper script)...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Help on SnapRAID

    update: after reading carefully the docs, I'm even more convinced that I am missing something: once a block is marked as bad, (if I understand correctly) a sync should ignore the bad blocks in regards to updating the parity. To sum up the events in a comprehensible manner: 1- ran snapraid sync from cli (no logs, alas), 11 data errors found. I have just the list of bad blocks and the path of just one of the corrupted files from what's left in the console 2- ran snapraid sync (scheduled helper script)...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Help on SnapRAID

    update: after reading carefully the docs, I'm even more convinced that I am missing something: once a block is marked as bad, (if I understand correctly) a sync should ignore the bad blocks in regards to updating the parity. To sum up the events in a comprehensible manner: 1- ran snapraid sync from cli (no logs, alas), 11 data errors found. I have just the list of bad blocks and the path of just one of the corrupted files from what's left in the console 2- ran snapraid sync (scheduled helper script)...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Help on SnapRAID

    update: after reading carefully the docs, I'm even more convinced that I am missing something: once a block is marked as bad, (if I understand correctly) a sync should ignore the bad blocks in regards to updating the parity. To sum up the events in a comprehensible manner: ran snapraid sync from cli (no logs, alas), 11 data errors found. I have just the list of bad blocks and the path of just one of the corrupted files from what's left in the console ran snapraid sync (scheduled helper script) next...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Help on SnapRAID

    update: after reading and re-reading the docs, I'm even more convinced that I am missing something: once a block is marked as bad, if I understand correctly, even running the sync command it should be ignored in regards to updating the parity. To sum up the events in a comprehensible manner: ran snapraid sync from cli (no logs, alas), 11 data errors found. I have just the list of bad blocks and the path of just one of the corrupted files from what's left in the console ran snapraid sync (scheduled...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Help on SnapRAID

    update: after reading and re-reading the docs, I'm even more convinced that I am missing something: once a block is marked as bad, if I understand correctly, even running the sync command it should still be left 'alone' and not put back into the parity file. To sum up the events in a comprehensible manner: ran snapraid sync from cli (no logs, alas), 11 data errors found. I have just the list of bad blocks and the path of just one of the corrupted files from what's left in the console ran snapraid...

  • Posted a comment on discussion Help on SnapRAID

    update: after reading and re-reading the docs, I'm even more convinced that I am missing something: once a block is marked as bad, if I understand correctly, even running the sync command it should still be left 'alone' and not put back into the parity file. Yet, running a check and a fix -e, in the logs I have no trace of the bad blocks anymore, or of the -fix actually fixing anything ... probably it's best if I keep my hands tied until someone helps me sort this out :) To sum up the events: ran...

View All

Personal Data

Username:
ilgrank
Joined:
2013-02-16 07:43:57

Projects

  • No projects to display.

Personal Tools