Glenn Babecki

Thanks for your insights about "jumping in," which mirror my experience as well. I also appreciate your observations and experience on how QP has in fact opened your mind to new ways to develop certain classes of software. I'm looking forward to becoming practiced with QP. Good to know there are others to help guide my learning journey. Thanks, Glenn

Miro, Thank you for the quick and comprehensive response to my questions. Since I'm using QP for personal interests and projects I obviously can't justify a proper commercial license. However, my initial understanding of the available tools leads me to believe I can do everything I need with the basic unlicensed offerings. Having access to QS, QXK, static analysis, and the test suite would be "sweet," but they are not required for the foreseeable future. I completely understand the need to protect...

I know this general topic has been discussed in many ways, but I would like to get some definitive clarification regarding the various product limitations related to the unlicensed mode (free GPLv3 license?). More specifically the variations on the QP/C and QP/C++ components and potential limitations of QM code generation. My understanding is that the "free" version of the QP bundle does not contain the following components and tools. QS software tracing component (QP Spy) QXK real-time kernel component...