SDCC's definition of NULL is non-compliant
I got this from mucking around with GCC-specific code, does SDCC just have identically named builtins that behave differently from GCC's builtins ?
Yeah, what I consider to be a bug here is the SIGSEGV, not the fact that it would error on a correct implementation.
Weird message on code that indirectly subtracts a variable by itself
[hc08/s08] SIGSEGV on code using goto to go back and forth
The same problem occurs with __builtin_strncpy.
[z80] SIGSEGV on initilaizing global with casted pointer to struct
[pdk13] Compiler hangs on ternary opertor returning expression that is converted to _Bool