Oops, didn't see David's response. I think capable_of will do. We'll make the switch for this and others. Excellent. BTW - the classification of GO MF under BFO:occurrent + many uses of capable_of should be visisble in go-plus.owl
PR should use capable_of (RO_0002215) instead of has_function here. This will align with GO.
Hi Darren, When we discussed this at the GOC DC meeing, I believe you said you'd...
Hi again Darren, One other suggestion to avoid objections from PRO users based on...
Hi Darren, I can see your problem with the ChEBI nomenclature. Certainly in my experience...
Hi Darren, I take your point on the specific suggestion, but are you sure you don't...
Alignment with ChEBI
Manually transferred to GitHub https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issue...