Regarding sha256/512 I made a mistake misread it. You could implement truncated sha512 (sha256/512) and that could be verfide by guymager (feature request) and there would be no need to use other tools for verification. Thank you for explaining reasons for separating hashing and verification. I understand it completely, but was just thinking creatively.
Hi Guy, tnx for the reply. Regarding sha 256/512 if I understan it correctly, EWF officially supports only MD5 and SHA1. Guymager already supports sha256 (ewf-x supports sha256/512 per https://github.com/libyal/libewf/issues/107) If Guymager would use sha512 and would truncate the hash to first 40 characters, the result would be the same as using sha256 but the hashing speed would be cca. 50 % faster. This would be especially usefull when verification of image is being done, where decompression is...
Implement faster compression and hashing algorithm (sha512)
Hi, I tried on two computers first is 64-bit Win7 other 32bit Win7. The number of...
Hi, i tried the above solution and it selects only 476 files out of cca. 8000 if...