User Activity

  • Modified a comment on discussion Technical Topics on VeraCrypt

    @idrassi I have finally found out what the issue was thanks to browser errors. (STATUS_BREAKPOINT) The fix was really simple and apparently comes from the 14900k CPU. Under stock performance core clock speed the corruption and STATUS_BREAKPOINTS errors happen. Lowering the Performance Core Clock speed from default (57) to (52) appears to fix the issue with both. I don't know if this is anything you can create a fix for or if it's only a CPU problem. I Followed this tutorial to fix my browser crashes...

  • Posted a comment on discussion Technical Topics on VeraCrypt

    @idrassi I have finally found out what the issue was thanks to browser errors. (STATUS_BREAKPOINT) The fix was really simple and apparently comes from the 14900k CPU. Under stock performance core clock speed the corruption and STATUS_BREAKPOINTS errors happen. Lowering the Performance Core Clock speed from default (57) to (52) appears to fix the issue with both. I don't know if this is anything you can create a fix for or if it's only a CPU problem.

  • Modified a comment on discussion Technical Topics on VeraCrypt

    @idrassi Latest update: AES only = OK Hidden volume AES = OK (3 Passes with ZERO corruption) Hidden volume + cascade = CORRUPTION , only tested AES(twofish)(Serpent) and AES(twofish) Not a problem with hidden volume it seems but more with cascade. Could you try a more accurate sample size in your tests ? my sample size is 515GB and 152'000 Files, i assume testing with 10 x 10GB or 50x10GB files would probably not result in any corruption. It probably has to do with the amount of files rather than...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Technical Topics on VeraCrypt

    @idrassi Latest update: AES only = OK Hidden volume AES = OK (3 Passes with ZERO corruption) Hidden volume + cascade = CORRUPTION , only tested AES(twofish)(Serpent) and AES(twofish) Not a problem with hidden volume it seems but more with cascade. Could you try a more accurate sample size in your tests ? my sample size is 515GB and 152'000 Files, i assume testing with 10 x 10GB files would probably not result in any corruption. It probably has to do with the amount of files rather than size since...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Technical Topics on VeraCrypt

    @idrassi Latest update: AES only = OK Hidden volume AES = OK (3 Passes with ZERO corruption) Hidden volume + cascade = CORRUPTION , only tested AES(twofish)(Serpent) and AES(twofish) Not a problem with hidden volume it seems but more with cascade. Could you try a more accurate sample size in your tests ? my sample size is 515GB and 152'000 Files, i assume testing with 10 x 10GB files would probably not result in any corruption. It probably has to do with the amount of files rather than size since...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Technical Topics on VeraCrypt

    @idrassi Latest update: AES only = OK Hidden volume AES = OK (3 Passes with ZERO corruption) Hidden volume + cascade = CORRUPTION , only tested AES(twofish)(Serpent) and AES(twofish) Not a problem with hidden volume it seems but more with cascade. Could you try a more accurate sample size in your tests ? my sample size is 515GB and 152'000 Files, i assume testing with 10 x 10GB files would probably not result in any corruption. It probably has to do with volume since it's such a low corruption p...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Technical Topics on VeraCrypt

    @idrassi Latest update: AES only = OK Hidden volume AES = OK (3 Passes with ZERO corruption) Hidden volume + cascade = CORRUPTION , only tested AES(twofish)(Serpent) and AES(twofish) Not a problem with hidden volume it seems but more with cascade. Could you try a more accurate sample size in your tests ? my sample size is 515GB and 152'000 Files, i assume testing with a 10 x 10GB files would probably not result in any corruption. It probably has to do with volume since it's such a low corruption...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Technical Topics on VeraCrypt

    @idrassi Latest update: AES only = OK Hidden volume AES = OK (3 Passes with ZERO corruption) Hidden volume + cascade = CORRUPTION , only tested AES(twofish)(Serpent) and AES(twofish) Not a problem with hidden volume it seems but more with cascade. Could you try a more accurate sample size in your tests ? my sample size is 515GB and 152'000 Files

View All

Personal Data

Username:
chrissyco
Joined:
2026-05-13 15:42:40.412000

Projects

  • No projects to display.

Personal Tools