Hi all, I really don’t understand why you don’t want to integrate my modification… It drops down execution timings… I already send 2 mails… Can you please take my request into account! Cédric From: discussion@cppcheck.p.re.sourceforge.net discussion@cppcheck.p.re.sourceforge.net On Behalf Of Daniel Marjamäki Sent: 06 September 2026 13:03 To: [cppcheck:discussion] development@discussion.cppcheck.p.re.sourceforge.net Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] [cppcheck:discussion] Cppcheck 2.22 EXPÉDITEUR EXTERNE /...
Hi, We have modified cppcheck 2.17.0 code to speed execution. Attached is a svn patch. We added a cache (-15min) and use a simplified Match function (MatchOneOf) for pattern like "x|y|z" (-5min). Run before modification 50 min. Cédric
Hi, I made a sample to reproduce those false/positives (see attached) main.cpp file. Cédric
Hi, We do some times encounter some problems with --inline-suppression. It doesn't always take into account the cppcheck-suppress reduntdantAssignment comment we add before the assignment (as if this comment was removed in the pre-processing process). I couldn't reproduce the problem with a simple example. Do you have an issue concerning this problem? Ccpcheck version is 1.87 Command line launched from project vcxproj folder: c:\dev\cppcheck\cppcheck.exe -j 8 --enable=all --std=c++14 --platform=win64...