BryanP

Thanks for the updates. I support the no limit approach for irradiance. In checking with our resource staff, it sounds like they ensure everything works well up to 1.4kW/m^2, but also have actual measured data with higher values, so 1.5 (or 2.0) would also be OK if you do need a limit. @Paulo: Also appreciate your input and detailed example. Perhaps There are certainly some work arounds possible with careful scaling of various parameters, but it seems the cleanest is to support the physical reality...

Maybe something generous such as 1.5 or 2, so as not to encounter arbitrary PV limits (would of course have clipping depending on inverter sizes). I'll ask around some of the resource guys how high they have seen in practice. On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 9:44 PM Roger Dugan rdugan@users.sourceforge.net wrote: I thought we had done it, but I just checked the code and the change never got made. The output power is still limited to Pmpp. I recall there was some debate over what it should be, but we probably...

Maybe something generous such as 1.5 or 2, so as not to encounter arbitrary PV limits (would of course have clipping depending on inverter sizes). I'll ask around some of the resource guys how high they have seen in practice.

Hi Roger, did this ever get resolved? It is very real to have irradiance >1kW/m^2 in real life measured data. Both favorable atmospheric phenomina and local effects, such as reflections off of snow or water can bring the irradiance notably higher. As such I also wonder if using the kVA limit is sufficient. It might need to be higher. Thanks, -Bryan

@dchassin: Almost. With the default options it now shows a helpful warning that it...

This problem is not limited to matlab link, but rather prevents all installs under...

OSX Installer fails under El Capitan (OSX 10.11)

That is a nice trick, will get some use in the few project I use that are still in...