Hi Team, Our requirement is to setup a patchwork instance for which setting up the incoming mail is crucial. We are using Davmail and getmail for the above mentioned purpose. The challege which we are facing with Davmail is described below The Initial authentication (MFA) can be done using O365Interactive mode post which we will get the refresh tokens in the davmail.properties file, we can use those refresh tokens for further authentications. Incase if the password is changed for the specified email...
Hi Team, Our requirement is to setup a patchwork instance for which setting up the incoming mail is crucial. We are using Davmail and getmail for the above mentioned purpose. The challege which we are facing with Davmail is described below The Initial authentication (MFA) can be done using O365Interactive mode post which we will get the refresh tokens in the davmail.properties file, we can use those refresh tokens for further authentications. Incase if the password is changed for the specified email...
Yes Thanks versat :-)
Yes I've enabled all the checks in preferences.
Hi versat, I got that due to too many #ifdef configurations, when i use --force in CLI violations are repeated But in GUI I got those violations only one time. Do you mean MISRA results or overall Cppcheck results? MISRA results Which version of Cppcheck are you using? Latest cppcheck 1.89
Hi versat, Thanks for your reply, This is my test condition #include<stdio.h> int main() { int a; (void)printf("\nEnter any number\n"); (void)scanf("%d",&a); if(a == 1) { // } if(a == 2) { // } if(a == 3) { // } return 0; } using the latest cppcheck 1.89, I've created a dump file ./cppcheck --dump /home/user/test_cppcheck_misra.c Checking /home/user/test_cppcheck_misra.c ... And using misra,py along with rule-texts(MISRA text), I tested for misra violation (rule:x "if condition should have terminating...
Hi, I'm getting different results in CLI (192 violations) and GUI (only 5 violations)
Please notify If there is any update on this. On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:12 PM B Dharma bdharma@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Hi, Some of the repeated MISRA violations aren't showing in cppcheck. say for example: "if statement should have a following else statement" this violations is showing for some part of the code only, not all files in my library code. Could you please help me in fixing this issue Use MISRA rules from the GUI? https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/general/thread/ccbe9e89/?limit=25&page=2#f836...