Audience
Small Business, Medium Business, Enterprise (I&C engineering teams at EPCs, owner-operators, SIs)
About Tagsight
Tagsight is the system of record for engineering data. It reads your drawing set into the instrument index, I/O list, equipment list, line list, and valve list a project runs on.
It reads P&IDs, single-line diagrams, loop diagrams, datasheets, and cable and junction-box schedules. Scanned sheets and CAD-exported PDFs read the same way. Every tag is classified to the standard the drawing already uses, whether that is ISA 5.1, KKS, IEC 81346, NORSOK, DIN 19227, or an operator-house convention.
An engineer confirms or corrects each read before anything leaves the tool. The register is reviewed, not assumed.
Tagsight exports to Excel, CSV, TIA Portal XML for Siemens S7, Rockwell L5X for Studio 5000, PLCCreator, DEXPI, JSON, and annotated PDF. It compares revisions so a Management of Change review shows only what changed. A REST API and an MCP server connect it to the rest of the toolchain.
Pricing
Integrations
Company Information
Product Details
Tagsight Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What kinds of users and organization types does Tagsight work with?
Q: What languages does Tagsight support in their product?
Q: What kind of support options does Tagsight offer?
Q: Does Tagsight have an API?
Q: What type of training does Tagsight provide?
Q: What pricing for support is available for Tagsight?
Tagsight Product Features
Engineering
Tagsight Verified User Reviews
Write a Review-
Probability You Would Recommend? 10 out of 10
"Easy to use" 5 out of 5 stars Edited 2026-09-27
Pros: The drawing viewer and extracted tables being connected is probably the strongest part. Clicking through the results makes it much easier to check tags without constantly going back and forth between a PDF and Excel.
Cons: Some symbols and tags on crowded sections of the drawing were missed or needed correction.
Overall: Tagsight is an interesting approach to a problem that is still surprisingly manual. I tested it with P&IDs and was impressed by how much information it could pull into a structured format. It still needs an engineer to verify the results, but even with that review step I can see it saving a lot of repetitive work.
Read More...
- Previous
- You're on page 1
- Next