MuSES

MuSES

ThermoAnalytics
+
+

Related Products

  • Azore CFD
    25 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • BAND
    3 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • CompUp
    66 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Innoslate
    93 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • SiteDocs
    290 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • IPVanish
    111 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • SafetyCulture
    647 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • AdRem NetCrunch
    165 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • TrustInSoft Analyzer
    6 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • LTX
    182 Ratings
    Visit Website

About

Electro-optic and infrared renderings in MuSES achieve global benchmark accuracy through a stepwise workflow – beginning with heat sources such as engines, exhaust, bearings, and electronics, followed by an in-band diffuse radiosity solution. Then place your sensor at range and render multi-bounce, spectrally-summed radiance values, with DeltaT-RSS contrast metrics. Sensor response curve handy? Import it and see what you’ve been missing. With MuSES, you have reality at your fingertips. Because MuSES covers physics all the way back to heat sources and environmental loads, you can manage thermal signature contrast and evaluate control kits for low observable design in any global location. Heat shields, cooling schemes, and even camo surface treatments can be tested and evaluated for in-band radiance, replete with atmospheric attenuation along sensor line-of-sight. Triage and prioritize your engineering with MuSES early in the development cycle.

About

Muse Spark 1.2 is Meta’s coding-focused model update designed to power Muse Code and improve software engineering workflows. The model is built for code generation, complex debugging, codebase understanding, long-horizon development tasks, and end-to-end developer workflows. Muse Spark 1.2 was co-trained with Muse Code to improve performance inside the terminal coding agent environment. It supports planning, goal conditioning, context compaction, subagent coordination, and iterative coding workflows across large repositories. The model was trained with expanded coding compute, diverse development environments, self-improvement loops, and long-running engineering tasks. Built for AI developers and software teams, Muse Spark 1.2 helps agents plan, write, validate, debug, and optimize code with greater autonomy.

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Audience

Companies seeking a complete EO/IR signature simulation software

Audience

AI developers, software engineers, coding agent builders, research teams, platform teams, DevOps teams, ML engineers, enterprise development teams, and organizations that need code generation, debugging, codebase understanding, long-horizon coding, terminal agents, subagent coordination, repository automation, kernel optimization, and end-to-end developer workflow support

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

API

Offers API

API

Offers API

Screenshots and Videos

Screenshots and Videos

Pricing

No information available.
Free Version
Free Trial

Pricing

$1.25 per 1M tokens (input)
$1.25 per million tokens in input, and $4.25 per million tokens of output
Free Version
Free Trial

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 0.0 / 5
ease 0.0 / 5
features 0.0 / 5
design 0.0 / 5
support 0.0 / 5

This software hasn't been reviewed yet. Be the first to provide a review:

Review this Software

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5
features 5.0 / 5
design 5.0 / 5

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Muse Spark 1.2 looks like a big step up for developers because it is clearly aimed at real software engineering work, not just casual code suggestions. The fact that it powers Muse Code makes it feel more practical right away, especially for terminal-based workflows where the model can help write code, validate changes, and work through bigger tasks. I like that Meta seems to be pushing hard into agentic coding. Earlier Muse Spark versions were already positioned around multimodal reasoning, tool use, and visual coding, and 1.2 feels like the more developer-focused evolution of that direction. The cost angle is interesting too. Reports mention Muse Code having multiple pricing tiers, including a cheaper option, which could matter a lot for developers running coding agents frequently instead of only using AI once in a while.

Cons

  • It is still new and tied to a beta coding agent, so I would not trust it blindly yet. I would want to test it on real repos, messy bugs, failing tests, multi-file edits, and longer agent runs before making it part of my daily stack. Meta also still has to prove the developer experience. A strong model is one thing, but coding agents live or die on tooling, speed, reliability, permissions, logs, diffs, and how well they recover when something breaks.

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Company Information

ThermoAnalytics
Founded: 1996
United States
www.thermoanalytics.com/muses

Company Information

Meta
Founded: 2004
United States
meta.ai

Alternatives

C-Radiant

C-Radiant

Aechelon Technology

Alternatives

Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5

Anthropic
MAK ONE

MAK ONE

MAK Technologies
Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic
Muse

Muse

Microsoft
Claude Mythos 5

Claude Mythos 5

Anthropic

Categories

Categories

Integrations

.NET
Bash
C++
Continue
Dart
Go
HTML
Java
JavaScript
Muse Code
Muse Image
Muse Spark
Objective-C
Odysseus
OpenAI Agents SDK
R
Ruby
SQL
WhatsApp
XML

Integrations

.NET
Bash
C++
Continue
Dart
Go
HTML
Java
JavaScript
Muse Code
Muse Image
Muse Spark
Objective-C
Odysseus
OpenAI Agents SDK
R
Ruby
SQL
WhatsApp
XML
Claim MuSES and update features and information
Claim MuSES and update features and information
Claim Muse Spark 1.2 and update features and information
Claim Muse Spark 1.2 and update features and information