+
+

Related Products

  • Google AI Studio
    30 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform
    999 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • JetBrains Junie
    12 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • PackageX OCR Scanning
    48 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Retool
    593 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Google Cloud BigQuery
    2,023 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • LM-Kit.NET
    29 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • XpertCoding
    42 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Fraud.net
    56 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • LTX
    182 Ratings
    Visit Website

About

We introduce the Granite series of decoder-only code models for code generative tasks (e.g., fixing bugs, explaining code, documenting code), trained with code written in 116 programming languages. A comprehensive evaluation of the Granite Code model family on diverse tasks demonstrates that our models consistently reach state-of-the-art performance among available open source code LLMs. The key advantages of Granite Code models include: All-rounder Code LLM: Granite Code models achieve competitive or state-of-the-art performance on different kinds of code-related tasks, including code generation, explanation, fixing, editing, translation, and more. Demonstrating their ability to solve diverse coding tasks. Trustworthy Enterprise-Grade LLM: All our models are trained on license-permissible data collected following IBM's AI Ethics principles and guided by IBM’s Corporate Legal team for trustworthy enterprise usage.

About

Muse Spark 1.2 is Meta’s coding-focused model update designed to power Muse Code and improve software engineering workflows. The model is built for code generation, complex debugging, codebase understanding, long-horizon development tasks, and end-to-end developer workflows. Muse Spark 1.2 was co-trained with Muse Code to improve performance inside the terminal coding agent environment. It supports planning, goal conditioning, context compaction, subagent coordination, and iterative coding workflows across large repositories. The model was trained with expanded coding compute, diverse development environments, self-improvement loops, and long-running engineering tasks. Built for AI developers and software teams, Muse Spark 1.2 helps agents plan, write, validate, debug, and optimize code with greater autonomy.

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Audience

Developers interested in a powerful AI coding model

Audience

AI developers, software engineers, coding agent builders, research teams, platform teams, DevOps teams, ML engineers, enterprise development teams, and organizations that need code generation, debugging, codebase understanding, long-horizon coding, terminal agents, subagent coordination, repository automation, kernel optimization, and end-to-end developer workflow support

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

API

Offers API

API

Offers API

Screenshots and Videos

Screenshots and Videos

Pricing

Free
Open source
Free Version
Free Trial

Pricing

$1.25 per 1M tokens (input)
$1.25 per million tokens in input, and $4.25 per million tokens of output
Free Version
Free Trial

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 0.0 / 5
ease 0.0 / 5
features 0.0 / 5
design 0.0 / 5
support 0.0 / 5

This software hasn't been reviewed yet. Be the first to provide a review:

Review this Software

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5
features 5.0 / 5
design 5.0 / 5

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Muse Spark 1.2 looks like a big step up for developers because it is clearly aimed at real software engineering work, not just casual code suggestions. The fact that it powers Muse Code makes it feel more practical right away, especially for terminal-based workflows where the model can help write code, validate changes, and work through bigger tasks. I like that Meta seems to be pushing hard into agentic coding. Earlier Muse Spark versions were already positioned around multimodal reasoning, tool use, and visual coding, and 1.2 feels like the more developer-focused evolution of that direction. The cost angle is interesting too. Reports mention Muse Code having multiple pricing tiers, including a cheaper option, which could matter a lot for developers running coding agents frequently instead of only using AI once in a while.

Cons

  • It is still new and tied to a beta coding agent, so I would not trust it blindly yet. I would want to test it on real repos, messy bugs, failing tests, multi-file edits, and longer agent runs before making it part of my daily stack. Meta also still has to prove the developer experience. A strong model is one thing, but coding agents live or die on tooling, speed, reliability, permissions, logs, diffs, and how well they recover when something breaks.

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Company Information

IBM
Founded: 1911
United States
www.ibm.com/granite

Company Information

Meta
Founded: 2004
United States
meta.ai

Alternatives

Alternatives

Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6

SpaceXAI
CodeQwen

CodeQwen

Alibaba
Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5

Anthropic
Codestral

Codestral

Mistral AI
Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic
Codestral Mamba

Codestral Mamba

Mistral AI

Categories

Categories

Integrations

.NET
Bash
C
CSS
Claude Agent SDK
Claude Code
Codex CLI
Facebook
Go
Hermes Agent
IBM Granite
IBM watsonx.ai
LlamaIndex
Meta AI
Meta Model API
Muse Video
PowerShell
Python
SQL
Vercel AI SDK

Integrations

.NET
Bash
C
CSS
Claude Agent SDK
Claude Code
Codex CLI
Facebook
Go
Hermes Agent
IBM Granite
IBM watsonx.ai
LlamaIndex
Meta AI
Meta Model API
Muse Video
PowerShell
Python
SQL
Vercel AI SDK
Claim Granite Code and update features and information
Claim Granite Code and update features and information
Claim Muse Spark 1.2 and update features and information
Claim Muse Spark 1.2 and update features and information