+
+

Related Products

  • JetBrains Junie
    12 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Retool
    593 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Google AI Studio
    30 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Screencapt
    138 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Checksum.ai
    1 Rating
    Visit Website
  • Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform
    999 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • BAND
    3 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Aikido Security
    239 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • Assembled
    272 Ratings
    Visit Website
  • JAMS
    279 Ratings
    Visit Website

About

Cursor is an AI coding agent and development platform for building ambitious software faster. The platform lets developers hand off tasks to agents that can build, test, demo, and prepare features for review. Cursor supports autonomous and parallel agent workflows, including cloud agents that can work on multiple tasks across repositories. It runs across the editor, terminal, Slack, and GitHub, helping teams automate coding, code review, PR workflows, and repetitive engineering work. Cursor also lets users choose from leading AI models for different tasks, including models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, SpaceXAI, and Cursor. Built for developers, engineering teams, and enterprises, Cursor helps accelerate software development while keeping humans focused on decisions and review.

About

Codex is an AI-powered coding agent from OpenAI designed to help developers build, manage, and ship software more efficiently across the entire development lifecycle. It acts as an intelligent pair programmer that can understand codebases, generate features, and deliver production-ready pull requests. Codex can safely execute commands in sandboxed environments while assisting with debugging, refactoring, and testing. A key advancement is its computer use capability, allowing it to operate your computer by seeing, clicking, and typing across applications. This enables Codex to interact with tools that don’t have APIs, making it useful for tasks like frontend testing and app navigation. The platform also includes an in-app browser and integrations with various developer tools for a more unified workflow. Codex supports automation by handling ongoing tasks such as monitoring, issue triage, and follow-ups.

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Platforms Supported

Windows
Mac
Linux
Cloud
On-Premises
iPhone
iPad
Android
Chromebook

Audience

Developers, engineering teams, software companies, startups, enterprise engineering organizations, product teams, DevOps teams, AI coding teams, code reviewers, and technical leaders that need AI coding agents, autonomous development, cloud agents, parallel task execution, code review, CLI workflows, Slack collaboration, GitHub integration, model choice, automations, and secure software development at scale

Audience

Codex is ideal for software developers, engineering teams, and tech organizations that want to automate coding tasks, leverage AI-driven workflows, and utilize computer-based automation to accelerate software development

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

Support

Phone Support
24/7 Live Support
Online

API

Offers API

API

Offers API

Screenshots and Videos

Screenshots and Videos

Pricing

$20/month
Free Version
Free Trial

Pricing

$20/month
Free Version
Free Trial

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5
features 5.0 / 5
design 5.0 / 5
support 5.0 / 5

Reviews/Ratings

Overall 5.0 / 5
ease 5.0 / 5
features 5.0 / 5
design 5.0 / 5
support 5.0 / 5

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • Cursor is one of the best AI coding tools because it feels built around how developers actually work. It is not just autocomplete; it can understand a repo, make edits, explain code, help debug, and work through bigger tasks with an agentic workflow. I like that it combines the familiar feel of a code editor with deeper AI features like Agent mode, project rules, MCP, skills, and CLI support. That makes it useful for everyday coding, but also flexible enough for more advanced workflows. The model options and pricing controls are also helpful. Being able to choose stronger or cheaper models depending on the task makes Cursor easier to fit into a real development routine.
  • I'm a novice to intermediate programmer and I've always felt a bit overwhelmed by editors. I've been learning to code by copy and pasting a million times into chatgpt. Switching to cursor saves me so much time, and I love how easy it is to give it the context. It has this awesome feature where you can upload docs into it and it can go pull the docs when answering questions, which was one of my biggest pain points as a user when AI would give me old docs or out of date code. Another epic feature was the natural language terminal commands, which have allowed me to get through projects i previously would get stuck on.

Cons

  • I don't have any cons about Cursor. Use it daily in my development.
  • No IDE is perfect, but this one is by far my favorite. I think most of the cons lie in the limitations of the AI models right now. I think the code interpreter is a littley sketchy to use becuase it's hard to see exactly what code its suggesting I change so I ran into some issues when using it without double checking the work, but it also saved me in a couple spots I got stuck.

Pros & Cons from Real Users

Pros

  • OpenAI Codex feels less like a coding assistant and more like a junior developer that can execute tasks independently. For knowledge workers juggling technical and non technical work, this shift is powerful because it can take a task, work through it, and return with usable results. Its ability to operate across full codebases is a major strength, allowing it to write, debug, test, and manage multiple files in a way that fits real world development workflows. The multi agent and automation capabilities are particularly useful since you can run parallel tasks and orchestrate work efficiently, which significantly improves productivity on complex projects. It is also expanding beyond pure coding with features that allow interaction with software environments, making it feel like a broader work assistant.

Cons

  • Codex can still struggle with very large or highly complex projects without iteration, and outputs often need refinement through multiple passes. The setup and workflow can feel heavier compared to simpler tools, especially when integrating with repositories or managing environments. There is also strong competition, and in some advanced or highly structured coding scenarios other tools may feel more precise.

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Training

Documentation
Webinars
Live Online
In Person

Company Information

Cursor
Founded: 2022
United States
www.cursor.com

Company Information

OpenAI
Founded: 2015
United States
openai.com

Alternatives

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains Junie

JetBrains

Alternatives

Perplexity Computer

Perplexity Computer

Perplexity AI
Bolt.new

Bolt.new

StackBlitz
Bolt.new

Bolt.new

StackBlitz
Devin Desktop

Devin Desktop

Cognition
Codex CLI

Codex CLI

OpenAI
Amp

Amp

Amp Code
Claude Code

Claude Code

Anthropic

Categories

Categories

Integrations

Adspirer
Agensi
Agentspan
Docsio
DryRun Security
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast
GPT‑5-Codex
GitHub
Inspector
OpenAI
OpenViking
Paperclip
Pencil
Spokenly
Superpowers
Superwhisper
bb
display.dev
ui.sh

Integrations

Adspirer
Agensi
Agentspan
Docsio
DryRun Security
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast
GPT‑5-Codex
GitHub
Inspector
OpenAI
OpenViking
Paperclip
Pencil
Spokenly
Superpowers
Superwhisper
bb
display.dev
ui.sh
Claim Cursor and update features and information
Claim Cursor and update features and information
Claim OpenAI Codex and update features and information
Claim OpenAI Codex and update features and information