DownloadPEBL (Psychology Experiment Building Language) is a system designed for creating psychology and neuroscience experiments and tests. It is cross-platform, with the intention to run the same experiment, unchanged, on Linux, Windows, and Macintosh PCs.
Project Samples
Categories
Site Management, Compilers, Interpreters, Design, Software Distribution, Presentation, Scientific/Engineering, Exam, Operating SystemsLicense
GNU General Public License version 2.0 (GPLv2)Follow Psychology Experiment Building Language
You Might Also Like
BrightGauge, a ConnectWise solution, was started in 2011 to fill a missing need in the small-to-medium IT Services industry: a better way to manage data and provide the value of work to clients. BrightGauge Software allows you to display all of your important business metrics in one place through the use of gauges, dashboards, and client reports. Used by more than 1,800 companies worldwide, BrightGauge integrates with popular business solutions on the market, like ConnectWise, Continuum, Webroot, QuickBooks, Datto, IT Glue, Zendesk, Harvest, Smileback, and so many more. Dig deeper into your data by adding, subtracting, multiplying, and dividing one metric against another. BrightGauge automatically computes these formulas for you. Want to show your prospects how quick you are to respond to tickets? Show off your data with embeddable gauges on public sites.
Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project
User Reviews
-
Hello, I would like you support to know how to qualify the Corsi Cubes according to their intervals, for example, if I have a score is 10, what does mean the 10, please?
-
I used PEBL for the Corsi block-tapping test and the Simon Task. As far as the Corsi test goes, PEBL was great. Easy to use, and explaint to participants how to do it. The data output was clear and easy to read. Unfortunately, the same can't be said for the Simon Task. Although the test it self was good, the data output was not clear to read. I needed to know which trials were congruent and incongruent. Unfortunately, this was not clearly shown on the excel files. I worked things around and manually wrote down what each trial was and cross-referenced it with the excel sheet however, even then nothing made sense. The column labeled "type" was the logical assumption as it had only two options, 1 and 2 (congruent or in congruent, or so I thought). When I matched what I wrote with the "type" column they didn't correspond. Trials that were congruent were both type 1 and 2. How is this possible? Does this mean that column "type" is for something else and the test doesn't record whether or not the trials were congruent or incongruent? The wiki article accompanied with the task has very little information, as so does the task on PEBL.