User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
8
4
2
1
1
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5

Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

  • A great editor!
  • This project is promising, but the UI is too sluggish. For example, after you toggle an option it takes like a second for the checkmark to show up. Also, when you put the caret on a bracket, it takes another split second for the bracket highlight to trigger. I admire the program for taking magnitudes less memory than VS Code, but VS Code feels a lot faster to work in. When you work in code at least eight hours a day, all that speed adds up.
    Reply from CudaText
    Edited 2024-05-14
    You mentioned 2 pauses: 1) menu checkmarks updating. Yes, app updates menu checkmarks not immediately but only on 'app is idle' event. This is made to prevent slowliness on editing the code. On purpose. We have option to change this pause: "ui_timer_idle" (default is 1000 msec). EDITED: in app 1.214.5+, menu checkmarks updating is instant now, w/o pauses! So this is solved. 2) pair brackets highlight. Yes, app finds and highlgiths brackets not immediately on caret move, but after a delay. This is made on purpose too, to avoid bigger CPU usage on caret moving. We have option to change this: "py_caret_slow". EDITED: in app 1.214.6+, I changed it from 500 to 100 (msec) and brackets finder is now fast.
  • Maybe this is a case of 'If you don't know, you don't need to know'. I've been hunting for half an hour for the Windows executable download like Mark below, but the links seem to be entirely circular. Try one to download and you get the addons. Go back to a Cuda link and you get Cuda at Github. Try another link and you're back where you started. Try 'releases' and you get addons. Try 'addons' and you get addons. Try the green Downloads and you get another page that gives you either an addons green button or circles back to the start. The Linux BSD Mac Windows words aren't tabs or even links. Talk about a program with potential dying from total obscurity. Could someone please explain how Sourceforge works? Yes, I understand it's a working platform for development, but as the great economist JK Galbraith once said, the purpose of all production is consumption. Please let me have CudaText. .exe
    Reply from CudaText
    Edited 2024-03-19
    "Try 'releases' and you get addons. Try 'addons' and you get addons. " --- No, trying of 'release' on SF FILES-page shows you the folder with different releases. Current one is 1.211.0, so 'release' page of FILES page has the folder 1.211.0.0. That folder has different packages for different OSes. 'cudatext.exe' file is in the Windows package. URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/cudatext/files/release/
  • Excellent editor that can handle large files.
  • Excellent editor!
  • I used to be skeptical about this editor: subjective feelings of inconsistency. But now I have discovered that sublime can't run macroses with searching. But Cuda text can!
    Reply from CudaText
    Posted 2020-12-26
    Yes, CudaText has the Macros plugin (3rd party) which can record also searches from the Find dialog. And many other actions can be in macros.
  • Thank you very much for the free open source program!
  • A promising software. There are other aspects that I think could be worked on but overall, at the moment it`s ok.
  • Just as another review mentioned, no actual program download fromo SourceForge, the [Download] button only yields a small "lexer" zip file. So at this point no idea what the software actually does and therefor even just two stars is already a stretch. And then folks wonder why Open Source software isn't making any inroads...
    1 user found this review helpful.
    Reply from CudaText
    Posted 2020-03-06
    Just added a NOTE to SF.net description field, that actual app files are at UVviewsoft.com. SF hosts only add-ons packages.
  • This is a classic example of "We don't need no stinkin' documentation!" There is nothing telling you how to install it. The files available here on SF are useless and you actually have to go to github to find anything. Once you get there, there is no documentation. It may be the most wonderful editor in existence, but I'll never know because I gave up on it when, after finally manually copying it to my "\Program Files" directory, it crashed because it wanted to write files back into the installation directory. Since this is a hard NO-NO in Windows (and should be anywhere else), I've deleted everything about it. My 3-star rating is simply recognition that there may be a decent app hidden under all these problems.
    2 users found this review helpful.
    Reply from CudaText
    Edited 2020-03-06
    I hoped that all users can see doc-WIKI links at the homepage UVviewsoft.com ? Seems no. Ok, added link to WIKI here at SF.net. Added link to homepage at SF.net. It is portable app for Windows so you must unpack zip file to any folder out of Program Files and run the EXE file. You must not use portable app in the Program Files folder. Only installers must copy files there.
  • Very promising text editor. I will observe how this project is being developed.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • CudaText is developing quickly, the developers are very active and also very responsive on the official forum. As CudaText is written in Object Pascal on Lazarus, they were able to provide official builds for Linux, macOS, Windows and FreeBSD that are all using native OS APIs but retain the same appearance on every system. CudaText is a very promising project and piece of software.
    2 users found this review helpful.
  • Really lightweight, and for this very small size, it can do great things. The plug-in mechanisms work perfectly; you can start coding right away. I'm starting to use it daily.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • Seems to be like poor mans sublime text, cheaper in money (100%) and ram usage (~38%). Surprisingly capable for such small and light program. I wish I could find the gtk3 version... Sublime handles quoting text a bit smarter and has better go-anywhere keybindings, but other than that, cuda seems just as good and in some areas even better alternative. Excellent editor just a bit short of perfect
    2 users found this review helpful.
    Reply from CudaText
    Posted 2020-12-26
    Sublime for poor man? Hmm. Look at https://wiki.freepascal.org/CudaText#Advantages_over_Sublime_Text_3
  • An excellent text editor to use for everyday work. It has most of the features needed to work with source code, and has a large number of plugins. Light-weight, does not have too many dependencies, and starts up quickly. It is also cross-platform - even has Linux-ARM support.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • I use CudaText instead of Sublime or Notepad++. CudaText is fast, stable and easy to use. It has Themes, Plugins, Code completion, Project Tree and more.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • Previous
  • You're on page 1
  • Next