User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
133
11
1
3
6
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 4 / 5

Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

  • Very professionnal tools !! a must to have !
  • lite, fast and really good IDE
  • handy
  • The Best for Linux!! Simply and Plainly speaking.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • perfect with many features!
  • Great IDE, small and fast
  • Great!
  • Great
  • Great C/C++ IDE!
  • Great lightweight IDE for C++
  • Best opensource free IDE!
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • Very very good IDE! Loving building applications with CodeBlocks.
  • Excellent IDE for a daily work. Very stable and plenty of features. Thank you.
  • Great software and intuitive too. Will have a lot of fun learning more about coding but from a different perspective.
  • Very elegant.
  • Great IDE. Best feature is that it is cross-platform! :)
  • Easy to use and very poweful. Thank you!!
  • Great
  • Good in general. Sometimes unstable(especially when saving and parsing code).
  • I'm currently using c++ 11 examples from the book c++ Primer 5th edition all examples that were written for GCC only. Works perfectly with TDM GCC except one function called Assert() could you please add this function to your ide. thanks P.S Even though i've included <cassert> or <assert.h> in the example codes it still won't let me compile it at all and gives me errors. I've already told the The msys and TDM GCC groups about this but just in case I thought that I should tell you about this problem as well in hope that one of you will fix this problem for me
  • Find Declaration of constructor still doesn't work. 2014 year now. Instead of showing declaration of constructor it shows declaration of class. Code::blocks svn 9455.
  • Well, it's a top level project, the latest release have not choked on any huge project yet, seems that the 4.7.1 compile's gone through well. The only objection are the presence of -march= in the preselectable row without any notice that such builds are non portable as of gcc 4.6 and up. Use -mtune= instead as I've tested quad cpu builds on many cpu's, down to pentiumm,s with gcc 4.6.1, 4.7.3, 4.8.1-4, builds with very minor decrease in execution speed. But for a specific machine, it's O.K. with -march And that's thoroughly, parsing some two billion lines of code in said manner. Also, don't understand the -fexpensive-optimizations selection as it turns on by default with -O2 maybe looks cool ?, though a very minor issue.
  • I am very saticfied with this project!
  • Pros: fast, easy install, easy to use and can use any compiler. Cons: well this is more of a pro i guess since it has no cons.
    1 user found this review helpful.
  • Excellent project! Reccommend everybody. Thanks!)))+1