User Ratings

★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
0
1
0
2
2
ease 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 1 / 5
features 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
design 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 3 / 5
support 1 of 5 2 of 5 3 of 5 4 of 5 5 of 5 1 / 5

Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project

User Reviews

  • Impossible to install. No Docker images officially supported. No documentation on how to run on cloud service. Run away
  • We have been using v2.5 .1 for a while now and works great, so I was planning upgrading to 3.2.1, took me 5 days just to figure out how to install it, had to create a "shark" postgress user among other things to make it work, I did a clean install. Performance is terrible, takes up to 20 seconds just to open/view/edit a card. What a terrible upgrade for such a good tool, will be staying on 2.5.1 for a bit more. All recommended versions were installed, I suspect thats the reason of the bad performance, I will test on earlier versions before ditching it.
    2 users found this review helpful.
  • Very easy to use, very flexible by allowing us to create new classes (tables). It would be nice if the developers were more active in answering questions in the forums.
  • It’s really very informative that I wanted ever, thanks for this. view the FusionHQ 2.0 review: watch?v=GuR30uw-6Cg
  • Impossible to install.