User Ratings
Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project
Featured Reviews
Highest Rated
Very easy to use, very flexible by allowing us to create new classes (tables). It would be nice if the developers were more active in answering questions in the forums.
Lowest Rated
We have been using v2.5 .1 for a while now and works great, so I was planning upgrading to 3.2.1, took me 5 days just to figure out how to install it, had to create a "shark" postgress user among other things to make it work, I did a clean install. Performance is terrible, takes up to 20 seconds just to open/view/edit a card. What a terrible upgrade for such a good tool, will be staying on 2.5.1 for a bit more. All recommended versions were installed, I suspect thats the reason of the bad performance, I will test on earlier versions before ditching it.
User Reviews
-
Impossible to install. No Docker images officially supported. No documentation on how to run on cloud service. Run away
-
We have been using v2.5 .1 for a while now and works great, so I was planning upgrading to 3.2.1, took me 5 days just to figure out how to install it, had to create a "shark" postgress user among other things to make it work, I did a clean install. Performance is terrible, takes up to 20 seconds just to open/view/edit a card. What a terrible upgrade for such a good tool, will be staying on 2.5.1 for a bit more. All recommended versions were installed, I suspect thats the reason of the bad performance, I will test on earlier versions before ditching it.
-
Very easy to use, very flexible by allowing us to create new classes (tables). It would be nice if the developers were more active in answering questions in the forums.
-
It’s really very informative that I wanted ever, thanks for this. view the FusionHQ 2.0 review: watch?v=GuR30uw-6Cg
-
Impossible to install.