wxOctave Reviews

This is my general viewpoints. There are several technical and minor points/problems which should be discussed in the forum. I'm sorry for having more negative viewpoints than positive. Positive: very cool idea. It can be literally equivalent to Matlab. Now I can show something to Windows-brainwashed fellows and say 'Here is Matlab for Linux! what else?' Negative and soluble: Lacks English documentation and comments No Autotools packaging : Developers uses an IDE (ZinjaI), and have not provided another packaging facility. But I get used to Autotools, and don't have ZinjaI! so how can I build and run the package? They uses Latin names for identifiers, so non-Latin users may have problems using the package The program has Workspace feature, but gain it by investigating input commands directly; so it does the same thing as the Octave interpreter do. The developers could try a bit harder, and use libOctave instead of the executable, so the result would be more efficient