From: Abrolag <ab...@us...> - 2009-09-20 16:11:23
|
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:29:14 -0400 Mark McCurry <mar...@gm...> wrote: > Sorry for the reply delay. > > >why not use decibels as units directly in the UI and in the > >MIDI conversion, making it easier for the user to have precise control > >over the results? > This is one of those things that is going to get implemented in > experimental. > Ideas have been tossed back and forth about how to do this, but I am fairly > sure progress has/will be made. > To be a bit more explicit, in order to give the user more direct access to > the internal values (rather than the [0,127] values), there needs to be a > good bit of code renovations. > This is because the backend of the code and the frontend can only > communicate with char ([0,127]) values at this time. > Experimental has been a bit slow at actually getting things done because I > think it is better to stay in the design phase for a while if it means that > the resulting system will be better. > > > >I find that -30dB isn't enough dynamic range, especially when I'm > >adding reverb to a part. > Well, with system effects you do have both the input volume control (ie > sendTo) and the controls for the individual effect, so the actual range > should be greater than that. > > --Mark McCurry I like the idea of this. My only concern here is how it may effect existing saved voice patches. It doesn't sound like it will - which is good. -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk |