Re: [Zynaddsubfx-user] an issue with new mono-mode

[yawfle <ya...@no...>]

On Monday 30 October 2006 13:59, Atte Andr=E9 Jensen=20
<att...@gm...> said:

> > I'm not sure I understand, do you mean that legato notes should not
> > take into account the new note velocity (keeping the first note
> > velocity) ?!
>
> That is exactly what I mean, yes.

While I understand where your feelings are coming from, there are just=20
too many times where I really like the effect of the change in volume=20
per note velocity to be able to agree here. It's true, though, that=20
much of the click/pop artifacts in legato mode do seem to relate to=20
velocity changes, from what I can tell. The best fix would be to ramp=20
(very quickly) the volume and filter settings to the new=20
velocity-determined ones, but I suspect that would take a lot of effort=20
to implement. This is why I was (pleasantly) surprised that the legato=20
hack sounds as good as it does as often as it does. For now, I plan to=20
try to create sound patches that work well with the legato mode, and be=20
happy with that. :)

Of course, someday maybe someone can create an option to use=20
velocity-per-note-on or velocity-per-retrigger and make everyone=20
happy...