From: Abrolag <ab...@us...> - 2009-05-24 06:26:36
|
On Sun, 24 May 2009 14:21:59 +1000 cal <ca...@gr...> wrote: > Harald Hvaal wrote: > > On Sunday 24. May 2009 08.43.38 cal wrote: > >> ... and I've got a full CMake build system working. Quite nice. > >> > > > > > > Would you like to share this build system with us? I also made a cmake setup > > for my zyn gui rewrite, but it's not finished so I'd like to see yours so > > maybe we can join forces in getting a good cmake setup going. > > > > Sure, but ... it goes with my modified code base, not the current cvs code. > Porting it to current cvs would require matching the source file names, and > matching the WANT_XXXX's to appropriate -DXXXX defines. And fixing whatever > else doesn't work :-). > > Basically, it visits each subdirectory building a list of source file names, > then does the build. I initially tried building a little temp library for > each subdirectory, but ran into weird linking problems. The info provided by > the CMake provided findFLTK.cmake gave me serious grief with linking, so > there's a custom FLTK check. Run ccmake/cmake/make from the zynaddsubfx > directory (ie, above src). > > Bear in mind that it's a work in progress. > > cheers, Cal > While I'm delighted to see people working on zyn. I am getting a bit concerned that you seem to be pulling in different directions. I would be really saddened if some of you became disheartened by such apparent splits. As a user (more than anything else) I do so want to see this project succeed. -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk |