#dpkg -i zorp_2.0.8-1_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 29578 files and directories
currently installed.)
Preparing to replace zorp 2.0.8-1 (using
zorp_2.0.8-1_i386.deb) ...
Stopping Zorp Firewall Suite:
Unpacking replacement zorp ...
Setting up zorp (2.0.8-1) ...
Starting Zorp Firewall Suite:
/usr/share/zorp/pylib/Zorp/Domain.py:126:
FutureWarning: hex/oct constants > sys.maxint will
return positive values in Python 2.4 and up
self.mask = 0xffffffff
/usr/share/zorp/pylib/Zorp/SockAddr.py:84:
FutureWarning: hex/oct constants > sys.maxint will
return positive values in Python 2.4 and up
parts = (((ip & 0xff000000) >> 24) & 0xff,
/usr/share/zorp/pylib/Zorp/Domain.py:126:
FutureWarning: hex/oct constants > sys.maxint will
return positive values in Python 2.4 and up
self.mask = 0xffffffff
/usr/share/zorp/pylib/Zorp/SockAddr.py:84:
FutureWarning: hex/oct constants > sys.maxint will
return positive values in Python 2.4 and up
parts = (((ip & 0xff000000) >> 24) & 0xff,
Logged In: YES
user_id=674941
It is a known problem, connected with the fact that mask
arithmetics
uses simple int type in the python layer.
This can be attacked by creating a type for addresses.
I am undecided on it yet.