Re: [Zookeeper-user] why Rcc checked in?

[Stefan G. <sg...@10...>]

Ah, I see.
Ok I create a first version of a patch that removes all System.exists  
in non main methods or there stacks.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1951065&group_id=209147&atid=1008546
I would be very happy to get feedback and hope there is a chance to  
get this into the next release.
Thank you guys very much for the good work on zookeeper, it is fun to  
use and a great tool!

Stefan

On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:

> You don't need to worry about Rcc. That utility is only used at  
> build time.
>
> ben
>
> On Thursday 24 April 2008 11:04:43 Stefan Groschupf wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I working on a patch to remove all System.exists.
>> I noticed that Rcc.java is checked in but actually is generated by
>> JavaCC.
>> I tried to remove Rcc.java but it was not regenerated when I did run
>> ant.
>>
>> How this is suposed to work?
>> Shouldn't that be generated into java/generated as well and created
>> during the build?
>>
>> So what would be the best way for now to get a fix into Rcc.java  
>> since
>> the code changes need to be done in rcc.jj
>> Thanks.
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> 101tec Inc.
>> Menlo Park, California, USA
>> http://www.101tec.com
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
>> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save  
>> $100.
>> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/java
>> one _______________________________________________
>> Zookeeper-user mailing list
>> Zoo...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zookeeper-user
>
>
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
101tec Inc.
Menlo Park, California, USA
http://www.101tec.com