From: Mahadev K. <ma...@ya...> - 2007-12-07 22:43:15
|
Well I am reflecting the same opinion as Ben and Andrew. I have worked on Hadoop and it uses ant. I have had no problems with ant and I really liked it. The good thing about ant was that it was really really easy to use and learn. Very simple build infrastructure that provides us with all we need. Any comments are welcome and if others think that maven provides us with a bigger advantage for a use case that's common, then I am all for it. Regards Mahadev > -----Original Message----- > From: zoo...@li... [mailto:zookeeper-user- > bo...@li...] On Behalf Of Benjamin Reed > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 2:37 PM > To: zoo...@li... > Subject: Re: [Zookeeper-user] Moving to maven >=20 > On Friday 07 December 2007, Andrew Kornev wrote: > > Please don't get me wrong: I'm not arguing that Ant is better than > Maven, > > nor do I have any specific objections to moving to Maven. I'm trying to > get > > a better idea how much a happier man I will be with Maven than I > currently > > am with Ant :-) >=20 > I'm in the same boat as Andrew. The overall philosophy seems good, but I > have > a feeling that I'm missing big advantage. You seemed to hint that Maven > facilitates integration into repositories. >=20 > ben >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php > _______________________________________________ > Zookeeper-user mailing list > Zoo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zookeeper-user |