From: Brian I. <in...@tt...> - 2002-07-31 08:31:48
|
On 26/07/02 11:15 +0300, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote: > Clark C . Evans wrote: > - And I'm *still* not 100% certain that a strong recommendation to place a > human-readable document at the "end of the rainbow" - making a duck be a > duck - isn't the simplest way all around. Much less headache all around and > a nice convenience besides. Plus no changes to the spec :-) Brian, you have > been silent throughout this discussion - do you have an opinion here? Other > people, thoughts? Sorry. I've been on the road. I'm still on the road, but should have decent online time in the next few weeks. As far as this stuff is concerned, I'm glad to take a backseat for a while. I guess I'd be inclined to agree with the above. I would suggest that the pot of gold be an index pointing to a human readable document, and any other future approved documents. I still think that a machine readable schema might be useful in certain applications, like YAML-RPC. Cheers, Brian |