From: Brian I. <in...@tt...> - 2001-08-09 10:58:40
|
On 09/08/01 12:27 +0200, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote: > Brian Ingerson [mailto:in...@tt...] wrote: > > Since I expect you will soon be finalizing the 1.0 spec, I am > > taking the time to review it and offer corrections and > > suggestions. > > Well, it seems it will have to wait until we reach a consensus > on the typing thing... But anyway: > > > 1) My email address is now in...@tt.... > > OK. Should I change it in all the old drafts as well? Don't bother. But please do make sure that the front page example matches the current spec. Otherwise it's embarrassing. Also, www.yaml.org needs to be cleaned up as well. I still give people that address. Either syncronize the pages or take all info off yaml.org and simply redirect to y.sf.net. > > 3) In 1.2, this sentence is not quite accurate: > > > > Further, YAML treats an empty line (two consecutive line > > breaks) as being equivalent to \n. > > > > The line is blank but not empty. It must still have the > > indenting characters. > > This is unnecessarily strict; the production allows the > indentation, but doesn't require it. This doesn't cause > any ambiguities, even if we use an empty line to separate > sections, because a section break is an empty line followed > by a zero-indentation node (as you have pointed out - thanks!). Not quite. I said "usually". There is an edge case: foo: multiline with trailing newlines bar: second key, same map Perhaps Clark's new requirement/wish of multilines requiring quotes takes care of this though: foo: 'multiline with trailing newlines ' bar: second key, same map |