From: Brad B. <bm...@ma...> - 2007-05-07 15:22:42
|
On 5/5/07, Oren Ben-Kiki <or...@be...> wrote: > We also discussed the concept of byte code representation for YAML. We > had a thread about this in Sep 2003 which went in the direction of a > specialized line-oriented format. However, Xitology has sold us on the > notion of using the "canonical" format as a byte code. > > The idea is to start with JSON, insist that every token will be on its > own line, and throw in the minimal number of features required to > present anything YAML supports (that is: tags, anchors and aliases, > directives, and '...'). The result would look something like: > > > { > "foo" > } > ... > { > !bar > "baz" > } Small question: In this canonical format, how do you expect to treat newlines that are in values, e.g., [ "Romeo Juliet" ] or [ "Romeo\nJuliet" ] -- Brad |