From: Tim P. <ti...@po...> - 2004-09-13 07:53:02
|
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 05:40, trans. (T. Onoma) wrote: > On Sunday 12 September 2004 10:44 pm, Clark C. Evans wrote: > > - > > issue: "23" and 23 are parsed the same > > note: this has not yet been approved by Brian > > reason: > > plain style flag is no longer reported to appliction >=20 > This is the one I find hardest to swallow. I am so used to writing 23 for= an=20 > integer and '23' or "23" for a string. Now I have to write !! 23 (or ! 23= ) to=20 > get a string. Just my two cents... 23 and '23' are the same!! implicit typing is optional and hence returned type should be consistent. Tim |