From: why t. l. s. <yam...@wh...> - 2004-08-06 20:51:29
|
awesome, thanks for the answers, oren. Oren Ben-Kiki wrote: > true: + > false: ! > > > couldn't the solitary exclamation be interpreted as an implicit transfer on an empty string? That syntax is still around, right? (The spec presently isn't loading for me.) int: ! "12" empty: ! "" and empty: ! i guess another option would be just an underscore. _why |