From: Brian I. <in...@tt...> - 2002-09-26 17:20:04
|
On 26/09/02 10:06 +0300, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote: > Brian Ingerson [mailto:in...@tt...] wrote: > > > > --- > > > > - foo > > > > - bar > > > > - baz > > > > ... > > > > > > Invalid. The '-' need to be indented the same. > > > > > > OK, so now this is invalid: > > > > --- > > - foo > > - bar > > - baz > > ... > > > > Right? > > Currently, no :-) The '-' are all indented at the same level, so it is OK. So you are saying that only the '-' is part of the indentation. I had thought it was the '-\s+'. So: --- foo: - foo aabcddeee a - indentation b - seq indicator considered part of indentation c - required space, not considered indentation d - incidental whitespace e - content What about this: --- foo: - bar: baz blah: - blah blah blah ... (Oren) Please discuss this a bit. Markup the various tokens. I know that you're usually a "just the facts" guy on these matters, but I think there could be misinterpretations. I'm especially curious about the last line (before ...). Error or not? If so, please state the exact reason why. Cheers, Brian |