From: Oren Ben-K. <or...@ri...> - 2002-09-14 07:49:30
|
Brian Ingerson [mailto:in...@tt...] wrote: > I think Clark described the intended usage very well. A > practical refactoring might be: ... > It is also important to understand how these keys operate > under the unknown types proposal. +1 > '=' (and possibly '//') > would simply be parsed as strings with an empty type. It > would be up to the loader to determine what to do with them. > This makes them much less magical. '//' is now out of the spec; if we re-introduce something like it we would probably need a different syntax (';' was proposed). Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki. |