|
From: Tony R. <ton...@pr...> - 2002-07-17 15:29:00
|
I'm interested in the concept of an XPipe as a workflow engine. Obviously any assembly line is a workflow (I'm sure Henry Ford would agree) but some of the bigger workflow engines out there have things like event driven processes within the flow (e.g. the car is only painted once the body is welded together) and parallel workflow (e.g. while the car is being welded together, the seats are being made). Do such complexities break the simplicity of the xpipe model or is it possible to write some XComponents that essentially allow event and parallel workflows? One of the things I was thinking about is that in say a parallel workflow, each assembly line is a pipe and multiple pipes connected together via some kind of logic would suggest a parallel workflow of sorts. If we take that concept one step higher, then we're going to have a situation where many different pipes can be connected to many different pipes. Thus an xpipe has the potential to be a workflow engine. A workflow engine where each process is simple and possible to re-use.. Lots of big vendors in that space though.... T. |