From: Arno P. <ar...@pu...> - 2010-09-09 14:04:24
|
Guys, in case you haven't heard yet, Apple has changed the iPhone SDK lincense agreement. I guess you all know about the infamous section 3.3.1. Here is the new section 3.3.1 as of today: "3.3.1 Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs." No more mentioning about "must be originally written in Objective-C..." Here is an official Apple press release: http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/09/09statement.html This is nothing short of a miracle! This means it is now perfectly legal to use XMLVM to write iPhone applications! Many happy smiles at our end!!! Arno |
From: Leo I. <leo...@gm...> - 2010-09-09 14:57:52
|
When apple says "Must not use or call private APIs" doesn't that mean that we can't use xmlvm? Does that mean that apple must approve all the APIs that we use? Isn't xmlvm a private api? On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Arno Puder <ar...@pu...> wrote: > > Guys, > > in case you haven't heard yet, Apple has changed the iPhone SDK lincense > agreement. I guess you all know about the infamous section 3.3.1. Here > is the new section 3.3.1 as of today: > > "3.3.1 Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner > prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs." > > No more mentioning about "must be originally written in Objective-C..." > > Here is an official Apple press release: > http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/09/09statement.html > > This is nothing short of a miracle! This means it is now perfectly legal > to use XMLVM to write iPhone applications! > > Many happy smiles at our end!!! > > Arno > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > |
From: Arno P. <ar...@pu...> - 2010-09-09 15:06:37
|
no. With "private API" they mean API that is available in iOS, but developers are not allowed to use. This has nothing to do with XMLVM. http://onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2008/03/25/the-apple-sdk-apis-apple-didnt-want-you-to-know-about.html Arno On 9/9/10 7:57 AM, Leo Izen wrote: > When apple says "Must not use or call private APIs" doesn't that mean > that we can't use xmlvm? Does that mean that apple must approve all the > APIs that we use? Isn't xmlvm a private api? > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Arno Puder <ar...@pu... > <mailto:ar...@pu...>> wrote: > > > Guys, > > in case you haven't heard yet, Apple has changed the iPhone SDK lincense > agreement. I guess you all know about the infamous section 3.3.1. Here > is the new section 3.3.1 as of today: > > "3.3.1 Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner > prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs." > > No more mentioning about "must be originally written in Objective-C..." > > Here is an official Apple press release: > http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/09/09statement.html > > This is nothing short of a miracle! This means it is now perfectly legal > to use XMLVM to write iPhone applications! > > Many happy smiles at our end!!! > > Arno > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > <mailto:xml...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > > > > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users |
From: Robert W. <mys...@ne...> - 2010-09-09 15:12:08
|
By definition, in this case, a private API is one of Apple's own undocumented APIs. On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Leo Izen <leo...@gm...> wrote: > When apple says "Must not use or call private APIs" doesn't that mean that > we can't use xmlvm? Does that mean that apple must approve all the APIs that > we use? Isn't xmlvm a private api? > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Arno Puder <ar...@pu...> wrote: > >> >> Guys, >> >> in case you haven't heard yet, Apple has changed the iPhone SDK lincense >> agreement. I guess you all know about the infamous section 3.3.1. Here >> is the new section 3.3.1 as of today: >> >> "3.3.1 Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner >> prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs." >> >> No more mentioning about "must be originally written in Objective-C..." >> >> Here is an official Apple press release: >> http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/09/09statement.html >> >> This is nothing short of a miracle! This means it is now perfectly legal >> to use XMLVM to write iPhone applications! >> >> Many happy smiles at our end!!! >> >> Arno >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> _______________________________________________ >> xmlvm-users mailing list >> xml...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > -- IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humor or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorized (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. |