The recent change to section 3.3.1 looks directly targeted at projects like
this.
Will XMLVM apps make it through the app store? Is constant appstore
compliance a commitment of the project?
Apple is free to write whatever they want in their license agreement. It
is a whole different question whether their license agreement complies
with various national laws. There are some stories that Apple may face
some antitrust inquiry in the US:
http://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/05/03/1952258/Apple-May-Face-Antitrust-Inquiry?art_pos=28
What Apple is doing right now is to create FUD (fear, uncertainty,
doubt). There is little point to debate what they mean by "originally
written in Objective-C". I refuse to even speculate what they might mean
by that, because I don't want to succumb to FUD. At this point I am not
aware that Apple has rejected any application written with the help of
XMLVM. Our own showcase application Xokoban is certainly still in the
AppStore:
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/xokoban/id322302746?mt=8
Arno
On 5/20/10 5:43 PM, Erol Fox wrote:
> The recent change to section 3.3.1 looks directly targeted at projects
> like this.
>
> Will XMLVM apps make it through the app store? Is constant appstore
> compliance a commitment of the project?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
