xmlvm-users

[xmlvm-users] Using OpenJDK classes instead of built-in stubs

[Barry L. <bar...@ao...>]

 

When I run:

  java -jar xmlvm.jar --in=myapp.jar --target=iphone-c --app-name=MyApp

I wind up with with my nicely converted code, but there's only the minimal set of core java classes, all of which appear to be hand-written. One thing my app uses that is completely missing from the generated code is java.util.TreeMap.

Should these missing classes be automatically converted from the classes in openjdk6-build.jar? I read something on the mailing list that suggested that this was going to happen, but it doesn't seem to be happening now.

If not, is there a way I can generate the classes from openjdk6-build.jar as part of my project? If not, is this a planned feature for the near future? Or is this something that is supported by the "iphone" target but not the "iphone-c" target yet?

Re: [xmlvm-users] Using OpenJDK classes instead of built-in stubs

[Arno P. <ar...@pu...>]

We are still struggling modularizing OpenJDK in order to reduce
dependencies. Those hand-written classes you see will eventually be
replaced. Note that the C backend is still work in progress.

Arno

On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:50 AM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...> wrote:


 When I run:

  java -jar xmlvm.jar --in=myapp.jar --target=iphone-c --app-name=MyApp

I wind up with with my nicely converted code, but there's only the minimal
set of core java classes, all of which appear to be hand-written. One thing
my app uses that is completely missing from the generated code is
java.util.TreeMap.

Should these missing classes be automatically converted from the classes in
openjdk6-build.jar? I read something on the mailing list that suggested that
this was going to happen, but it doesn't seem to be happening now.

If not, is there a way I can generate the classes from openjdk6-build.jar as
part of my project? If not, is this a planned feature for the near future?
Or is this something that is supported by the "iphone" target but not the
"iphone-c" target yet?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev

_______________________________________________
xmlvm-users mailing list
xml...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users

Re: [xmlvm-users] Using OpenJDK classes instead of built-in stubs

[Sascha H. <sa...@xm...>]

Yes, using target-iphone gives you a broader coverage, so you might want to
try it. It will be replaced with the c backend at some point. Then, as you
rightly assumed, we will be cross-compiling most of the JDK classes you use.

// Sascha

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Arno Puder <ar...@pu...> wrote:

>
> We are still struggling modularizing OpenJDK in order to reduce
> dependencies. Those hand-written classes you see will eventually be
> replaced. Note that the C backend is still work in progress.
>
> Arno
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:50 AM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...> wrote:
>
>
>  When I run:
>
>   java -jar xmlvm.jar --in=myapp.jar --target=iphone-c --app-name=MyApp
>
> I wind up with with my nicely converted code, but there's only the minimal
> set of core java classes, all of which appear to be hand-written. One thing
> my app uses that is completely missing from the generated code is
> java.util.TreeMap.
>
> Should these missing classes be automatically converted from the classes in
> openjdk6-build.jar? I read something on the mailing list that suggested that
> this was going to happen, but it doesn't seem to be happening now.
>
> If not, is there a way I can generate the classes from openjdk6-build.jar
> as part of my project? If not, is this a planned feature for the near
> future? Or is this something that is supported by the "iphone" target but
> not the "iphone-c" target yet?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
>
>

Re: [xmlvm-users] Using OpenJDK classes instead of built-in stubs

[Barry L. <bar...@ao...>]

Is the modularization work taking place on a branch somewhere? If you let me know the areas that are problematic, I'd be interested in trying to help out.


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Arno Puder <ar...@pu...>
To: Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...>
Cc: xmlvm-users <xml...@li...>
Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2010 8:47 am
Subject: Re: [xmlvm-users] Using OpenJDK classes instead of built-in stubs




We are still struggling modularizing OpenJDK in order to reduce dependencies. Those hand-written classes you see will eventually be replaced. Note that the C backend is still work in progress.


Arno

On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:50 AM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...> wrote:




 

When I run:

  java -jar xmlvm.jar --in=myapp.jar --target=iphone-c --app-name=MyApp

I wind up with with my nicely converted code, but there's only the minimal set of core java classes, all of which appear to be hand-written. One thing my app uses that is completely missing from the generated code is java.util.TreeMap.

Should these missing classes be automatically converted from the classes in openjdk6-build.jar? I read something on the mailing list that suggested that this was going to happen, but it doesn't seem to be happening now.

If not, is there a way I can generate the classes from openjdk6-build.jar as part of my project? If not, is this a planned feature for the near future? Or is this something that is supported by the "iphone" target but not the "iphone-c" target yet?





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev

_______________________________________________
xmlvm-users mailing list
xml...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users


 

Re: [xmlvm-users] Using OpenJDK classes instead of built-in stubs

[Leo I. <leo...@gm...>]

Will you be making obscure classes such as java.util.Stack, which is better
replaced with things such as java.util.Deque? (ArrayDeque or LinkedList)? Or
are you only making the recommended use classes? I'd prefer everything,
because I kinda like java.util.Vector and java.util.Stack!

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...> wrote:

>
> Is the modularization work taking place on a branch somewhere? If you let
> me know the areas that are problematic, I'd be interested in trying to help
> out.
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Arno Puder <ar...@pu...>
> To: Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...>
> Cc: xmlvm-users <xml...@li...>
> Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2010 8:47 am
> Subject: Re: [xmlvm-users] Using OpenJDK classes instead of built-in stubs
>
>
>  We are still struggling modularizing OpenJDK in order to reduce
> dependencies. Those hand-written classes you see will eventually be
> replaced. Note that the C backend is still work in progress.
>
>  Arno
>
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:50 AM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...> wrote:
>
>
>  When I run:
>
>   java -jar xmlvm.jar --in=myapp.jar --target=iphone-c --app-name=MyApp
>
> I wind up with with my nicely converted code, but there's only the minimal
> set of core java classes, all of which appear to be hand-written. One thing
> my app uses that is completely missing from the generated code is
> java.util.TreeMap.
>
> Should these missing classes be automatically converted from the classes in
> openjdk6-build.jar? I read something on the mailing list that suggested that
> this was going to happen, but it doesn't seem to be happening now.
>
> If not, is there a way I can generate the classes from openjdk6-build.jar
> as part of my project? If not, is this a planned feature for the near
> future? Or is this something that is supported by the "iphone" target but
> not the "iphone-c" target yet?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
>
>

Re: [xmlvm-users] Using OpenJDK classes instead of built-in stubs

[Arno P. <ar...@pu...>]

the plan is to support the standard JDK.

Arno


On 9/30/10 12:39 PM, Leo Izen wrote:
> Will you be making obscure classes such as java.util.Stack, which is
> better replaced with things such as java.util.Deque? (ArrayDeque or
> LinkedList)? Or are you only making the recommended use classes? I'd
> prefer everything, because I kinda like java.util.Vector and
> java.util.Stack!
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...
> <mailto:bar...@ao...>> wrote:
>
>
>     Is the modularization work taking place on a branch somewhere? If
>     you let me know the areas that are problematic, I'd be interested in
>     trying to help out.
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Arno Puder <ar...@pu... <mailto:ar...@pu...>>
>     To: Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao... <mailto:bar...@ao...>>
>     Cc: xmlvm-users <xml...@li...
>     <mailto:xml...@li...>>
>     Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2010 8:47 am
>     Subject: Re: [xmlvm-users] Using OpenJDK classes instead of built-in
>     stubs
>
>
>     We are still struggling modularizing OpenJDK in order to reduce
>     dependencies. Those hand-written classes you see will eventually be
>     replaced. Note that the C backend is still work in progress.
>
>     Arno
>
>     On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:50 AM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...
>     <mailto:bar...@ao...>> wrote:
>
>>
>>     When I run:
>>
>>       java -jar xmlvm.jar --in=myapp.jar --target=iphone-c
>>     --app-name=MyApp
>>
>>     I wind up with with my nicely converted code, but there's only the
>>     minimal set of core java classes, all of which appear to be
>>     hand-written. One thing my app uses that is completely missing
>>     from the generated code is java.util.TreeMap.
>>
>>     Should these missing classes be automatically converted from the
>>     classes in openjdk6-build.jar? I read something on the mailing
>>     list that suggested that this was going to happen, but it doesn't
>>     seem to be happening now.
>>
>>     If not, is there a way I can generate the classes from
>>     openjdk6-build.jar as part of my project? If not, is this a
>>     planned feature for the near future? Or is this something that is
>>     supported by the "iphone" target but not the "iphone-c" target yet?
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
>>     and start using them to simplify application deployment and
>>     accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
>>     http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     xmlvm-users mailing list
>>     xml...@li...
>>     <mailto:xml...@li...>
>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
>     and start using them to simplify application deployment and
>     accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
>     http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
>     _______________________________________________
>     xmlvm-users mailing list
>     xml...@li...
>     <mailto:xml...@li...>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users