Menu
▾
▴
xmlvm-users — For current and interested XMLVM users, for public discussions and anouncements.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(147) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(49) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(148) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(135) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(68) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(94) |
Feb
(55) |
Mar
(114) |
Apr
(78) |
May
(64) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(33) |
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Sascha H. <sa...@xm...> - 2010-09-10 13:49:02
|
Do you have the iPhone SDK installed on the Mac? // Sascha On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Biardzki, Michal < mbi...@mi...> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I try to convert demo include to xmlvm. I compile xmlvm and demos > > in Netbeans, everything work fine. But when I convert class files from > > demo to iphone app and copy everything to Mac machine I try to run > > Makefile and there is an syntax error in this line > > > > ifeq (a, a$(IPHONE_SDK_HOME)). > > > > I never work with make so I don’t rely know > > what to do with this? I attach Makefile. ASAP. > > > > Regards, > > M. Biardzki > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Automate Storage Tiering Simply > Optimize IT performance and efficiency through flexible, powerful, > automated storage tiering capabilities. View this brief to learn how > you can reduce costs and improve performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > |
|
From: Sascha H. <sa...@xm...> - 2010-09-09 15:55:29
|
Hi Andrew, you are completely right. I just submitted a change that will change the processing pipeline to produce .c files with target=c, but .m files with target=iphone and iphonec. If you want to you can also specify the extension with the new command line argument --c-source-extension= in combination with target=c. Thanks for pointing this out and let me know if this change addresses your problem. // Sascha On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Andrew deBlois <de...@ao...> wrote: > When using the --target=c, the output files now use the ".m" extension. > Although this could be addressed with a simple script, will there be > and option that allows ".c" to be used instead? > > Thanks, > Andrew > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > |
|
From: Robert W. <mys...@ne...> - 2010-09-09 15:12:08
|
By definition, in this case, a private API is one of Apple's own undocumented APIs. On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Leo Izen <leo...@gm...> wrote: > When apple says "Must not use or call private APIs" doesn't that mean that > we can't use xmlvm? Does that mean that apple must approve all the APIs that > we use? Isn't xmlvm a private api? > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Arno Puder <ar...@pu...> wrote: > >> >> Guys, >> >> in case you haven't heard yet, Apple has changed the iPhone SDK lincense >> agreement. I guess you all know about the infamous section 3.3.1. Here >> is the new section 3.3.1 as of today: >> >> "3.3.1 Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner >> prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs." >> >> No more mentioning about "must be originally written in Objective-C..." >> >> Here is an official Apple press release: >> http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/09/09statement.html >> >> This is nothing short of a miracle! This means it is now perfectly legal >> to use XMLVM to write iPhone applications! >> >> Many happy smiles at our end!!! >> >> Arno >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> _______________________________________________ >> xmlvm-users mailing list >> xml...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > -- IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humor or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorized (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. |
|
From: Arno P. <ar...@pu...> - 2010-09-09 15:06:37
|
no. With "private API" they mean API that is available in iOS, but developers are not allowed to use. This has nothing to do with XMLVM. http://onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2008/03/25/the-apple-sdk-apis-apple-didnt-want-you-to-know-about.html Arno On 9/9/10 7:57 AM, Leo Izen wrote: > When apple says "Must not use or call private APIs" doesn't that mean > that we can't use xmlvm? Does that mean that apple must approve all the > APIs that we use? Isn't xmlvm a private api? > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Arno Puder <ar...@pu... > <mailto:ar...@pu...>> wrote: > > > Guys, > > in case you haven't heard yet, Apple has changed the iPhone SDK lincense > agreement. I guess you all know about the infamous section 3.3.1. Here > is the new section 3.3.1 as of today: > > "3.3.1 Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner > prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs." > > No more mentioning about "must be originally written in Objective-C..." > > Here is an official Apple press release: > http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/09/09statement.html > > This is nothing short of a miracle! This means it is now perfectly legal > to use XMLVM to write iPhone applications! > > Many happy smiles at our end!!! > > Arno > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > <mailto:xml...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > > > > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users |
|
From: Leo I. <leo...@gm...> - 2010-09-09 14:57:52
|
When apple says "Must not use or call private APIs" doesn't that mean that we can't use xmlvm? Does that mean that apple must approve all the APIs that we use? Isn't xmlvm a private api? On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Arno Puder <ar...@pu...> wrote: > > Guys, > > in case you haven't heard yet, Apple has changed the iPhone SDK lincense > agreement. I guess you all know about the infamous section 3.3.1. Here > is the new section 3.3.1 as of today: > > "3.3.1 Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner > prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs." > > No more mentioning about "must be originally written in Objective-C..." > > Here is an official Apple press release: > http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/09/09statement.html > > This is nothing short of a miracle! This means it is now perfectly legal > to use XMLVM to write iPhone applications! > > Many happy smiles at our end!!! > > Arno > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > |
|
From: Andrew d. <de...@ao...> - 2010-09-09 14:54:52
|
When using the --target=c, the output files now use the ".m" extension. Although this could be addressed with a simple script, will there be and option that allows ".c" to be used instead? Thanks, Andrew |
|
From: Sascha H. <sa...@xm...> - 2010-09-09 14:48:07
|
Hi guys, following the good news of Apple relaxing their developer license agreement I have other good news for all XMLVM users: As we are starting to deal with a lot of files when cross-compiling big parts of the OpenJDK we were wondering how we can speed up the process. Along the way I found a few low-hanging fruits and submitted a few changes in the last two days that should speed up compilation of big quantities significantly. Example: "ant all" should only take half the time it used to take. Let me know if you find any bugs I might have introduced with this. I will continue to speed up processing and will try to let XMLVM make use of multi-cores much better, so you can use XMLVM more efficiently. // Sascha |
|
From: Arno P. <ar...@pu...> - 2010-09-09 14:04:24
|
Guys, in case you haven't heard yet, Apple has changed the iPhone SDK lincense agreement. I guess you all know about the infamous section 3.3.1. Here is the new section 3.3.1 as of today: "3.3.1 Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs." No more mentioning about "must be originally written in Objective-C..." Here is an official Apple press release: http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/09/09statement.html This is nothing short of a miracle! This means it is now perfectly legal to use XMLVM to write iPhone applications! Many happy smiles at our end!!! Arno |
|
From: Sascha H. <sa...@xm...> - 2010-09-09 13:29:33
|
It's in src/xmlvm2c and the COutputProcess. But as Arno mentioned, it's heavy work in progress, at the moment. // Sascha On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Lennie De Villiers <len...@gm...>wrote: > Where is the C back-end in SVN? > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Sascha Haeberling <sa...@xm...> > wrote: > > It's similar to the iphone target, but we use it for our current > development > > with the C backend. So when you use iphone-c, the generated code will be > in > > C and not ObjectiveC. It is a temporary target only. It will eventually > > replace the current 'iphone' target. > > // Sascha > > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Lennie De Villiers <len...@gm...> > > wrote: > >> > >> What does the new iphone-c target do? > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...> wrote: > >> > Arno- > >> > > >> > Thanks for the tip, that gives me a starting point. > >> > > >> > What is the plan for implementing the native methods that will be > needed > >> > by > >> > the OpenJDK classes? Will they all be hand-implemented, or will you > try > >> > to > >> > use OpenJDK's own C implementations of the native methods? That > strikes > >> > me > >> > as a bigger implementation headache than the number of dependencies > you > >> > are > >> > encountering (I'm sad to say I'm not surprised at the 3K dependencies > on > >> > Hello World; I don't think you're going to be able to whittle that > down > >> > by > >> > too much without losing some potential functionality). > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Arno Puder <ar...@pu...> > >> > To: xmlvm-users <xml...@li...> > >> > Sent: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 4:33 pm > >> > Subject: Re: [xmlvm-users] Examples for iphone-c target > >> > > >> > > >> > note that the C backend is undergoing rapid changes. Today we managed > to > >> > get a first version of iFireworks (XMLVM's trademark application) > >> > working with the C backend. Make sure you update XMLVM and then try > >> > this: > >> > ant > >> > java -Xmx700m -jar dist/xmlvm.jar --target=iphone-c \ > >> > --app-name=iFireworks \ > >> > --resource=demo/iphone/ifireworks/ires/ \ > >> > --in=build/demo/iphone/ifireworks/org/xmlvm/demo/ifireworks \ > >> > --out=out > >> > open out/iFireworks.xcodeproj/ > >> > There are two big todo items at this point: > >> > 1. Implement the Cocoa wrappers. In many cases it should be possible > >> > to migrate the existing Objective-C wrapper. > >> > 2. OpenJDK: the iFireworks demo uses hand-written versions of > dependent > >> > J2SE classes (such as java.lang.String). Our plan is to > >> > cross-compile > >> > OpenJDK. The good news is that the C backend is powerful enough > >> > to cross-compile OpenJDK. But the bad news is that we are > struggling > >> > with dependencies. A simple Hello World pulls in 3000(!) classes > >> > from the OpenJDK. > >> > Things are moving fast and I'm sure we'll find solutions to the > >> > remaining problems. Stay tuned. > >> > Arno > >> > On 9/8/10 3:35 PM, Barry Linsdau wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Are there any "Hello World" examples of the new "iphone-c" target out > >> >> there? None of my experiments seem to be generating anything that > will > >> >> compile. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > >> >> > >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. > >> >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> xmlvm-users mailing list > >> >> xml...@li... > >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > >> > Show off your parallel programming skills. > >> > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > xmlvm-users mailing list > >> > xml...@li... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > >> > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > >> > > >> > Show off your parallel programming skills. > >> > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > xmlvm-users mailing list > >> > xml...@li... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Lennie De Villiers Blog: http://lenniedevilliers.blogspot.com/ > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > >> > >> Show off your parallel programming skills. > >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > >> _______________________________________________ > >> xmlvm-users mailing list > >> xml...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > > > > > > > -- > Lennie De Villiers Blog: http://lenniedevilliers.blogspot.com/ > |
|
From: Lennie De V. <len...@gm...> - 2010-09-09 09:15:30
|
Where is the C back-end in SVN? On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Sascha Haeberling <sa...@xm...> wrote: > It's similar to the iphone target, but we use it for our current development > with the C backend. So when you use iphone-c, the generated code will be in > C and not ObjectiveC. It is a temporary target only. It will eventually > replace the current 'iphone' target. > // Sascha > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Lennie De Villiers <len...@gm...> > wrote: >> >> What does the new iphone-c target do? >> >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...> wrote: >> > Arno- >> > >> > Thanks for the tip, that gives me a starting point. >> > >> > What is the plan for implementing the native methods that will be needed >> > by >> > the OpenJDK classes? Will they all be hand-implemented, or will you try >> > to >> > use OpenJDK's own C implementations of the native methods? That strikes >> > me >> > as a bigger implementation headache than the number of dependencies you >> > are >> > encountering (I'm sad to say I'm not surprised at the 3K dependencies on >> > Hello World; I don't think you're going to be able to whittle that down >> > by >> > too much without losing some potential functionality). >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Arno Puder <ar...@pu...> >> > To: xmlvm-users <xml...@li...> >> > Sent: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 4:33 pm >> > Subject: Re: [xmlvm-users] Examples for iphone-c target >> > >> > >> > note that the C backend is undergoing rapid changes. Today we managed to >> > get a first version of iFireworks (XMLVM's trademark application) >> > working with the C backend. Make sure you update XMLVM and then try >> > this: >> > ant >> > java -Xmx700m -jar dist/xmlvm.jar --target=iphone-c \ >> > --app-name=iFireworks \ >> > --resource=demo/iphone/ifireworks/ires/ \ >> > --in=build/demo/iphone/ifireworks/org/xmlvm/demo/ifireworks \ >> > --out=out >> > open out/iFireworks.xcodeproj/ >> > There are two big todo items at this point: >> > 1. Implement the Cocoa wrappers. In many cases it should be possible >> > to migrate the existing Objective-C wrapper. >> > 2. OpenJDK: the iFireworks demo uses hand-written versions of dependent >> > J2SE classes (such as java.lang.String). Our plan is to >> > cross-compile >> > OpenJDK. The good news is that the C backend is powerful enough >> > to cross-compile OpenJDK. But the bad news is that we are struggling >> > with dependencies. A simple Hello World pulls in 3000(!) classes >> > from the OpenJDK. >> > Things are moving fast and I'm sure we'll find solutions to the >> > remaining problems. Stay tuned. >> > Arno >> > On 9/8/10 3:35 PM, Barry Linsdau wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Are there any "Hello World" examples of the new "iphone-c" target out >> >> there? None of my experiments seem to be generating anything that will >> >> compile. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> xmlvm-users mailing list >> >> xml...@li... >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> > Show off your parallel programming skills. >> > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> > _______________________________________________ >> > xmlvm-users mailing list >> > xml...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> > >> > Show off your parallel programming skills. >> > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> > _______________________________________________ >> > xmlvm-users mailing list >> > xml...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Lennie De Villiers Blog: http://lenniedevilliers.blogspot.com/ >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> _______________________________________________ >> xmlvm-users mailing list >> xml...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > -- Lennie De Villiers Blog: http://lenniedevilliers.blogspot.com/ |
|
From: Arno P. <ar...@pu...> - 2010-09-09 08:46:59
|
I think the native methods are manageable. There are certainly a few but usually are easy to implement. I don't think we can leverage from the OpenJDK in this case; native methods are inherently dependent on the platform and we will need proper versions for iOS. Arno On 9/8/10 5:54 PM, Barry Linsdau wrote: > Arno- > > Thanks for the tip, that gives me a starting point. > > What is the plan for implementing the native methods that will be needed > by the OpenJDK classes? Will they all be hand-implemented, or will you > try to use OpenJDK's own C implementations of the native methods? That > strikes me as a bigger implementation headache than the number of > dependencies you are encountering (I'm sad to say I'm not surprised at > the 3K dependencies on Hello World; I don't think you're going to be > able to whittle that down by too much without losing some potential > functionality). > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Arno Puder <ar...@pu...> > To: xmlvm-users <xml...@li...> > Sent: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 4:33 pm > Subject: Re: [xmlvm-users] Examples for iphone-c target > > > note that the C backend is undergoing rapid changes. Today we managed to > get a first version of iFireworks (XMLVM's trademark application) > working with the C backend. Make sure you update XMLVM and then try this: > > ant > java -Xmx700m -jar dist/xmlvm.jar --target=iphone-c \ > --app-name=iFireworks \ > --resource=demo/iphone/ifireworks/ires/ \ > --in=build/demo/iphone/ifireworks/org/xmlvm/demo/ifireworks \ > --out=out > open out/iFireworks.xcodeproj/ > > There are two big todo items at this point: > > 1. Implement the Cocoa wrappers. In many cases it should be possible > to migrate the existing Objective-C wrapper. > 2. OpenJDK: the iFireworks demo uses hand-written versions of dependent > J2SE classes (such as java.lang.String). Our plan is to cross-compile > OpenJDK. The good news is that the C backend is powerful enough > to cross-compile OpenJDK. But the bad news is that we are struggling > with dependencies. A simple Hello World pulls in 3000(!) classes > from the OpenJDK. > > Things are moving fast and I'm sure we'll find solutions to the > remaining problems. Stay tuned. > > Arno > > > On 9/8/10 3:35 PM, Barry Linsdau wrote: >> >> >> Are there any "Hello World" examples of the new "iphone-c" target out >> there? None of my experiments seem to be generating anything that will >> compile. >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> xmlvm-users mailing list >> xml...@li... <mailto:xml...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... <mailto:xml...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > > > > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users |
|
From: Sascha H. <sa...@xm...> - 2010-09-09 08:41:00
|
It's similar to the iphone target, but we use it for our current development with the C backend. So when you use iphone-c, the generated code will be in C and not ObjectiveC. It is a temporary target only. It will eventually replace the current 'iphone' target. // Sascha On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Lennie De Villiers <len...@gm...>wrote: > What does the new iphone-c target do? > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...> wrote: > > Arno- > > > > Thanks for the tip, that gives me a starting point. > > > > What is the plan for implementing the native methods that will be needed > by > > the OpenJDK classes? Will they all be hand-implemented, or will you try > to > > use OpenJDK's own C implementations of the native methods? That strikes > me > > as a bigger implementation headache than the number of dependencies you > are > > encountering (I'm sad to say I'm not surprised at the 3K dependencies on > > Hello World; I don't think you're going to be able to whittle that down > by > > too much without losing some potential functionality). > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Arno Puder <ar...@pu...> > > To: xmlvm-users <xml...@li...> > > Sent: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 4:33 pm > > Subject: Re: [xmlvm-users] Examples for iphone-c target > > > > > > note that the C backend is undergoing rapid changes. Today we managed to > > get a first version of iFireworks (XMLVM's trademark application) > > working with the C backend. Make sure you update XMLVM and then try this: > > ant > > java -Xmx700m -jar dist/xmlvm.jar --target=iphone-c \ > > --app-name=iFireworks \ > > --resource=demo/iphone/ifireworks/ires/ \ > > --in=build/demo/iphone/ifireworks/org/xmlvm/demo/ifireworks \ > > --out=out > > open out/iFireworks.xcodeproj/ > > There are two big todo items at this point: > > 1. Implement the Cocoa wrappers. In many cases it should be possible > > to migrate the existing Objective-C wrapper. > > 2. OpenJDK: the iFireworks demo uses hand-written versions of dependent > > J2SE classes (such as java.lang.String). Our plan is to cross-compile > > OpenJDK. The good news is that the C backend is powerful enough > > to cross-compile OpenJDK. But the bad news is that we are struggling > > with dependencies. A simple Hello World pulls in 3000(!) classes > > from the OpenJDK. > > Things are moving fast and I'm sure we'll find solutions to the > > remaining problems. Stay tuned. > > Arno > > On 9/8/10 3:35 PM, Barry Linsdau wrote: > >> > >> > >> Are there any "Hello World" examples of the new "iphone-c" target out > >> there? None of my experiments seem to be generating anything that will > >> compile. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > >> > >> Show off your parallel programming skills. > >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> xmlvm-users mailing list > >> xml...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > > _______________________________________________ > > xmlvm-users mailing list > > xml...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > > _______________________________________________ > > xmlvm-users mailing list > > xml...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > > > > > > > -- > Lennie De Villiers Blog: http://lenniedevilliers.blogspot.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > |
|
From: Lennie De V. <len...@gm...> - 2010-09-09 08:28:28
|
What does the new iphone-c target do? On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...> wrote: > Arno- > > Thanks for the tip, that gives me a starting point. > > What is the plan for implementing the native methods that will be needed by > the OpenJDK classes? Will they all be hand-implemented, or will you try to > use OpenJDK's own C implementations of the native methods? That strikes me > as a bigger implementation headache than the number of dependencies you are > encountering (I'm sad to say I'm not surprised at the 3K dependencies on > Hello World; I don't think you're going to be able to whittle that down by > too much without losing some potential functionality). > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Arno Puder <ar...@pu...> > To: xmlvm-users <xml...@li...> > Sent: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 4:33 pm > Subject: Re: [xmlvm-users] Examples for iphone-c target > > > note that the C backend is undergoing rapid changes. Today we managed to > get a first version of iFireworks (XMLVM's trademark application) > working with the C backend. Make sure you update XMLVM and then try this: > ant > java -Xmx700m -jar dist/xmlvm.jar --target=iphone-c \ > --app-name=iFireworks \ > --resource=demo/iphone/ifireworks/ires/ \ > --in=build/demo/iphone/ifireworks/org/xmlvm/demo/ifireworks \ > --out=out > open out/iFireworks.xcodeproj/ > There are two big todo items at this point: > 1. Implement the Cocoa wrappers. In many cases it should be possible > to migrate the existing Objective-C wrapper. > 2. OpenJDK: the iFireworks demo uses hand-written versions of dependent > J2SE classes (such as java.lang.String). Our plan is to cross-compile > OpenJDK. The good news is that the C backend is powerful enough > to cross-compile OpenJDK. But the bad news is that we are struggling > with dependencies. A simple Hello World pulls in 3000(!) classes > from the OpenJDK. > Things are moving fast and I'm sure we'll find solutions to the > remaining problems. Stay tuned. > Arno > On 9/8/10 3:35 PM, Barry Linsdau wrote: >> >> >> Are there any "Hello World" examples of the new "iphone-c" target out >> there? None of my experiments seem to be generating anything that will >> compile. >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> xmlvm-users mailing list >> xml...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > -- Lennie De Villiers Blog: http://lenniedevilliers.blogspot.com/ |
|
From: Barry L. <bar...@ao...> - 2010-09-09 00:59:24
|
Arno-
Thanks for the tip, that gives me a starting point.
What is the plan for implementing the native methods that will be needed by the OpenJDK classes? Will they all be hand-implemented, or will you try to use OpenJDK's own C implementations of the native methods? That strikes me as a bigger implementation headache than the number of dependencies you are encountering (I'm sad to say I'm not surprised at the 3K dependencies on Hello World; I don't think you're going to be able to whittle that down by too much without losing some potential functionality).
-----Original Message-----
From: Arno Puder <ar...@pu...>
To: xmlvm-users <xml...@li...>
Sent: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 4:33 pm
Subject: Re: [xmlvm-users] Examples for iphone-c target
note that the C backend is undergoing rapid changes. Today we managed to
get a first version of iFireworks (XMLVM's trademark application)
working with the C backend. Make sure you update XMLVM and then try this:
ant
java -Xmx700m -jar dist/xmlvm.jar --target=iphone-c \
--app-name=iFireworks \
--resource=demo/iphone/ifireworks/ires/ \
--in=build/demo/iphone/ifireworks/org/xmlvm/demo/ifireworks \
--out=out
open out/iFireworks.xcodeproj/
There are two big todo items at this point:
1. Implement the Cocoa wrappers. In many cases it should be possible
to migrate the existing Objective-C wrapper.
2. OpenJDK: the iFireworks demo uses hand-written versions of dependent
J2SE classes (such as java.lang.String). Our plan is to cross-compile
OpenJDK. The good news is that the C backend is powerful enough
to cross-compile OpenJDK. But the bad news is that we are struggling
with dependencies. A simple Hello World pulls in 3000(!) classes
from the OpenJDK.
Things are moving fast and I'm sure we'll find solutions to the
remaining problems. Stay tuned.
Arno
On 9/8/10 3:35 PM, Barry Linsdau wrote:
>
>
> Are there any "Hello World" examples of the new "iphone-c" target out
> there? None of my experiments seem to be generating anything that will
> compile.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
xmlvm-users mailing list
xml...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
|
|
From: Arno P. <ar...@pu...> - 2010-09-08 23:33:33
|
note that the C backend is undergoing rapid changes. Today we managed to
get a first version of iFireworks (XMLVM's trademark application)
working with the C backend. Make sure you update XMLVM and then try this:
ant
java -Xmx700m -jar dist/xmlvm.jar --target=iphone-c \
--app-name=iFireworks \
--resource=demo/iphone/ifireworks/ires/ \
--in=build/demo/iphone/ifireworks/org/xmlvm/demo/ifireworks \
--out=out
open out/iFireworks.xcodeproj/
There are two big todo items at this point:
1. Implement the Cocoa wrappers. In many cases it should be possible
to migrate the existing Objective-C wrapper.
2. OpenJDK: the iFireworks demo uses hand-written versions of dependent
J2SE classes (such as java.lang.String). Our plan is to cross-compile
OpenJDK. The good news is that the C backend is powerful enough
to cross-compile OpenJDK. But the bad news is that we are struggling
with dependencies. A simple Hello World pulls in 3000(!) classes
from the OpenJDK.
Things are moving fast and I'm sure we'll find solutions to the
remaining problems. Stay tuned.
Arno
On 9/8/10 3:35 PM, Barry Linsdau wrote:
>
>
> Are there any "Hello World" examples of the new "iphone-c" target out
> there? None of my experiments seem to be generating anything that will
> compile.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
|
|
From: Barry L. <bar...@ao...> - 2010-09-08 22:35:50
|
Are there any "Hello World" examples of the new "iphone-c" target out there? None of my experiments seem to be generating anything that will compile. |
|
From: Shekar M. <sh...@fa...> - 2010-09-07 19:52:08
|
Please ignore my earlier message. It turns out the following frameworks need to be added to the project to link the application properly. At the risk of stating the obvious, here are the frameworks that seem to be necessary: MediaPlayer QuartzCore OpenGLES AVFoundation AudioToolbox MessageUI Thanks. On 9/7/10 3:36 PM, Shekar Mantha wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > I finally upgraded my machine and added a bunch of frameworks (to get > rid of some link errors) but I am still left with these five link errors: > > "_OBJC_CLASS_$_CATransition", referenced from: > "_OBJC_CLASS_$_MPMoviePlayerController", referenced from: > "_OBJC_CLASS_$_CAAnimation", referenced from: > "_OBJC_CLASS_$_CALayer", referenced from: > "_OBJC_CLASS_$_CAEAGLLayer", referenced from: > > Any ideas how I can resolve these? > > Thanks. > > > On 9/6/10 3:00 PM, Panayotis Katsaloulis wrote: >> On 06 Σεπ 2010, at 8:26 μ.μ., Shekar Mantha wrote: >> >>> So, the latest version is Xcode 3.2.3 and iOS SDK 4.02. >>> >>> Is XMLVM compatible with the above? >>> >> Yes it is >> :) >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> _______________________________________________ >> xmlvm-users mailing list >> xml...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users |
|
From: Shekar M. <sh...@fa...> - 2010-09-07 19:34:10
|
Thanks for the reply. I finally upgraded my machine and added a bunch of frameworks (to get rid of some link errors) but I am still left with these five link errors: "_OBJC_CLASS_$_CATransition", referenced from: "_OBJC_CLASS_$_MPMoviePlayerController", referenced from: "_OBJC_CLASS_$_CAAnimation", referenced from: "_OBJC_CLASS_$_CALayer", referenced from: "_OBJC_CLASS_$_CAEAGLLayer", referenced from: Any ideas how I can resolve these? Thanks. On 9/6/10 3:00 PM, Panayotis Katsaloulis wrote: > On 06 Σεπ 2010, at 8:26 μ.μ., Shekar Mantha wrote: > >> So, the latest version is Xcode 3.2.3 and iOS SDK 4.02. >> >> Is XMLVM compatible with the above? >> > > Yes it is > :) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users |
|
From: Panayotis K. <pan...@pa...> - 2010-09-06 19:01:05
|
On 06 Σεπ 2010, at 8:26 μ.μ., Shekar Mantha wrote: > So, the latest version is Xcode 3.2.3 and iOS SDK 4.02. > > Is XMLVM compatible with the above? > Yes it is :) |
|
From: Shekar M. <sh...@fa...> - 2010-09-06 17:52:45
|
So, the latest version is Xcode 3.2.3 and iOS SDK 4.02. Is XMLVM compatible with the above? Thanks. On 9/6/10 1:17 PM, Shekar Mantha wrote: > What is the latest XCode? Apple says I have to upgrade to Snow Leopard > to run the latest XCode. > > Also I had a typo -- I am running Leopard (not Snow Leopard) > > On 9/6/10 12:55 PM, Panayotis Katsaloulis wrote: >> On 06 Σεπ 2010, at 6:58 μ.μ., Shekar Mantha wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> … >>> I am running XCode 3.1.2 on Tiger OS. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Shekar >> >> Unfortunately you need latest Xcode to use XMLVM >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> _______________________________________________ >> xmlvm-users mailing list >> xml...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users |
|
From: Arno P. <ar...@pu...> - 2010-09-06 17:16:53
|
you have no choice but to update everything. The latest iPhone SDK requires Snow Leopard. Arno On 9/6/10 10:17 AM, Shekar Mantha wrote: > What is the latest XCode? Apple says I have to upgrade to Snow Leopard > to run the latest XCode. > > Also I had a typo -- I am running Leopard (not Snow Leopard) > > On 9/6/10 12:55 PM, Panayotis Katsaloulis wrote: >> On 06 Σεπ 2010, at 6:58 μ.μ., Shekar Mantha wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> … >>> I am running XCode 3.1.2 on Tiger OS. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Shekar >> >> >> Unfortunately you need latest Xcode to use XMLVM >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> _______________________________________________ >> xmlvm-users mailing list >> xml...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users |
|
From: Shekar M. <sh...@fa...> - 2010-09-06 17:15:31
|
What is the latest XCode? Apple says I have to upgrade to Snow Leopard to run the latest XCode. Also I had a typo -- I am running Leopard (not Snow Leopard) On 9/6/10 12:55 PM, Panayotis Katsaloulis wrote: > On 06 Σεπ 2010, at 6:58 μ.μ., Shekar Mantha wrote: > >> Hi, >> … >> I am running XCode 3.1.2 on Tiger OS. >> >> Thanks, >> Shekar > > > Unfortunately you need latest Xcode to use XMLVM > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users |
|
From: Panayotis K. <pan...@pa...> - 2010-09-06 16:55:14
|
On 06 Σεπ 2010, at 6:58 μ.μ., Shekar Mantha wrote: > Hi, > … > I am running XCode 3.1.2 on Tiger OS. > > Thanks, > Shekar Unfortunately you need latest Xcode to use XMLVM |
|
From: Shekar M. <sh...@fa...> - 2010-09-06 16:23:17
|
Hi, Just did an svn update on the XMLVM repository, built xmlvm and generated ObjC code for my Android application. I get a few compile errors. Most notably, here are the ones that have me flummoxed: 1. Compiling java_lang_Object.m (part of the Andriod compat-lib, I think): Line 43: objc_setAssociatedObject(self, &memberKey, members, OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN); warning: implicit declaration of function objc_setAssociatedObject error: OBJC_ASSOCIATION_RETAIN undeclared (first use in this function) 2. Compiling java_lang_String.m Line 258: NSRange found = [self rangeOfString:regex options:NSRegularExpressionSearch]; error: NSRegularExpressionSearch undeclared (first use in this function) 3. org_xmlvm_iphone_MFMailComposeViewController.m Line 21: #import "org_xmlvm_iphone_MFMailComposeViewController.h" error: MessageUI/MessageUI.h No such file or directory error MessageUI/MFMailComposeViewController.h No such file or directory I am running XCode 3.1.2 on Tiger OS. Thanks, Shekar |
|
From: tony o. <to...@so...> - 2010-09-06 15:01:57
|
Hi, If you are suggesting that I provide assistance to create these items, I'd love to, if not for the fact the what I know about iPhone programming could fit in a thimble with room left over :< > > 3. Re: Android -> iPhone (Arno Puder) > > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:58:37 -0700 > From: Arno Puder <ar...@pu...> > Subject: Re: [xmlvm-users] Android -> iPhone > To: xml...@li... > Message-ID: <4C7...@pu...> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > sorry, but none of the Android classes you mentioned are supported by > XMLVM. You can see all the classes that we support in > xmlvm/src/android2iphone. If an Android class is missing in that > directory, we don't support it. Of course that doesn't mean that support > can be added. Patches are always welcome! :-) > > Arno > > > On 8/31/10 8:47 AM, tony obrien wrote: >> Hello .. >> >> XCode is telling me it cannot find a number of header files .. some examples include: >> >> android_app_PendingIntent.h >> android_telephony_SmsManager.h >> android_telephony_gsm_SmsMessage.h >> >> I scoured the XMLVM output of my android project and TRUNK folders but to no avail. >> >> If these actions in Android are not yet supported for conversion to iPhone and I missed that in the docs, then I apologize... I would appreciate a hint as to where this sort of stuff is in the XMLVM documentation. >> regards, tob Tony O'Brien Sourcecode, LLC 856.596.6644 www.sourcecode-llc.com www.sourcecode-llc.com/tss www.sourcecode-llc.com/tssdonor |
18 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
