From: Jeff P. <jcp...@ro...> - 2012-04-04 16:46:19
|
In the spirit of simplification, is there ever any reason to specify -in? There could be stuff that never would really get used with a jar marked as -in as well? Not a big deal. Another way to say this is why could not --in at least have the slimming characteristics of --deps as well? Jeff On 4/3/12 5:05 PM, "Sascha Haeberling" <sa...@xm...> wrote: > Instead of --in I wold recommend using --deps as it should only pull in the > portions of the library that you need. Whereas --in would cross-compile the > whole library. > > // Sascha |