From: Paul P. <bay...@gm...> - 2012-02-23 16:23:36
|
Yes, that's correct. We had a discussion regarding protocols at the time, and it was decided to use interfaces, which I believe is the right decision. There were a few topics, but the main one was the difficultly of implementation. In the end, using Java interfaces with Obj-C protocols involved using wrapper instances to invoke the correct Java methods. Architecturally, I do not believe we should change back to abstract classes. Additionally, I have found that the C version of XMLVM has exceeded the Obj-C version. While it is unfortunate that forward progress has broken that part of the Obj-C version of XMLVM, I am not sure it is worth it to spend time on the Obj-C version, which I view as legacy. To me that means that some prior projects may use the Obj-C version, but continued support isn't necessary. Released projects should be dependent on fixed source code, so the evolution of XMLVM shouldn't affect them. I certainly wouldn't object if someone wanted to provide an update though, and I would be happy to give some pointers. I understand that you are still invested in the Obj-C version, so I'm sure we'll have a difference of opinion & I'd like to hear your point of view as well. Thanks, Paul On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Panayotis Katsaloulis < pan...@pa...> wrote: > Hello all! > > After revision 2080 (committed by ppoley), the UIViewAnimationDelegate is > broken in the ObjC version. > Although in Java it is defined as an interface, in ObjC is defined as an > abstract class. > > This would bring once more the question, interfaces or abstract classes, > but at any case, for the time being, the ObjC part in terms of some UIView > parts is broken. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning > Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing > also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > |